Parashat Hashavua DevarimHaftarah Isaiah 1:1-27Daf Yomi Chullin 77929 Judges 19 (230)Daily Mishnah Mishnah Kelim 17:16-17Daily Rambam Leavened and Unleavened Bread 7Daily Rambam (3 Chapters) Sacrificial Procedure 16-18Daf a Week Nedarim 90Halakhah Yomit Shulchan Arukh, Orach Chayim 224:4-6Arukh HaShulchan Yomi Orach Chaim 318:47-54Tanakh Yomi Proverbs Seder 8Chok LeYisrael DevarimTanya Yomi 2 AvYerushalmi Yomi Jerusalem Talmud Bava Metzia 31

929 (Tanakh) · Hebrew-School Dropout · Deep-Dive

Exodus 4

Deep-DiveHebrew-School DropoutNovember 12, 2025

Hello, friend. Remember those Hebrew School days? Maybe the stories felt a little… flat. Like perfectly pressed, two-dimensional heroes marching through neatly packaged miracles. Moses, especially, often gets painted as the quintessential, unflappable prophet, ready to drop everything and follow divine orders without a blink. If your memory of him is a stained-glass window of unwavering faith and immediate obedience, you're not alone. That's the stale take most of us were handed.

Hook

That image of Moses – the flawless, immediate hero, the man of instant faith – it's a beautiful picture, but it's also a deeply unhelpful one. It’s the kind of simplification that makes spiritual journeys feel impossibly out of reach for us mere mortals, us adults who spend our days navigating the tangled complexities of work, family, and existential dread. We were taught, perhaps implicitly, that true faith means never doubting, never questioning, never feeling utterly inadequate for the task at hand. And if that’s the bar, well, most of us "bounced off" that notion pretty quickly, feeling like spiritual failures before we even started.

Why did this take become so stale? Because it stripped Moses of his most relatable, most profoundly human quality: his profound, visceral hesitation. It turned a nuanced, back-and-forth dialogue with the Divine into a monologue of unquestioning assent. What was lost in that simplification was the profound, radical truth that God doesn't demand immediate, perfect compliance, but rather engages with our doubts, our fears, our very human limitations. We lost the story of a God who meets us in our "no, but…", who works with our perceived weaknesses, not just despite them. We missed the opportunity to see ourselves, with all our self-doubt and imposter syndrome, reflected in the very foundation of our spiritual narratives.

The consequence? Many of us walked away from these texts feeling like they weren't for us. That faith was for the "chosen few" who had an innate, unwavering conviction we simply lacked. We internalized the idea that if we weren't ready to leap without looking, we weren't truly "spiritual." But what if the story isn't about the leap, but about the struggle to take even the first step? What if the struggle itself is part of the sacred journey?

Let's dust off Exodus Chapter 4, where Moses isn't a statue, but a man wrangling with the most terrifying job offer imaginable. He's not just hesitant; he’s actively, passionately trying to talk his way out of it. And in his struggle, we'll find a radically refreshing vision of divine partnership, human vulnerability, and the surprising power of saying, "I can't – or at least, not alone." You weren't wrong to feel disconnected from that perfect hero; let's try again with the deeply human Moses.

Full Experience in the App

Listen. Chat. Go deeper.

Audio playback, interactive chevruta, Hebrew tools, and every daily learning track — only in Derekh Learning.

Download on the App Store

Context

The Nature of Divine Calling: Not a Clear "Yes"

In the Torah, a divine calling is rarely a straightforward, easy "yes." Far from it. Throughout biblical narratives, prophets and leaders often exhibit profound resistance, fear, and even outright negotiation when tasked with monumental responsibilities. Think of Jonah, who famously tried to flee his prophetic mission, or Jeremiah, who protested his youth and lack of eloquence. This pattern isn't an anomaly; it's a feature. It suggests that the divine often calls the unwilling or the unprepared, not necessarily the pre-qualified. This isn't about God being cruel or manipulative, but about a process that often requires individuals to stretch far beyond their comfort zones, to confront their deepest insecurities, and to rely on something beyond their own capabilities. Moses's lengthy back-and-forth with God in Exodus 3 and 4 is a prime example, a protracted negotiation that demystifies the idea of instant, joyful obedience and instead highlights the very human grappling that precedes profound purpose. It suggests that our initial resistance isn't a sign of unworthiness, but perhaps a natural, even necessary, part of stepping into a greater calling.

"Signs" (אותות, Otot): More Than Magic Tricks

When God offers Moses "signs" – the rod turning into a snake, his hand becoming leprous and then whole again, water turning to blood – it's easy to dismiss them as mere theatrical magic designed to impress a skeptical audience. However, the biblical concept of otot (signs) is far richer. These are not just parlor tricks; they are tangible manifestations meant to bridge the gap between the intangible divine and human understanding. They serve multiple purposes:

  • Validation for the Messenger: They assure Moses (and implicitly, future generations) that this is indeed a divine encounter, not a delusion.
  • Conviction for the Audience: For the Israelites, who have been enslaved for generations, and for Pharaoh, who embodies a pagan worldview, these signs are meant to provide concrete evidence of a power beyond their comprehension, validating Moses's authority and God's presence.
  • Preparation for the Message: The signs are not just about what God can do, but about who God is. They reveal aspects of divine power and intention, preparing the people for the magnitude of the redemption to come.
  • Symbolic Meaning: Each sign often carries deeper symbolic weight. The rod becoming a snake, then returning to a rod, speaks to the transformation of the mundane into the miraculous, and the power to control chaos. The leprosy, a sign of impurity and suffering, being healed, speaks to God's power over affliction and restoration. Water turning to blood hints at judgment and the sanctity of life. These signs, therefore, are not simply rules of engagement, but profound communications in a language the people can understand, affirming divine presence and purpose in a tangible way.

Demystifying the "Rule-Heavy" Misconception: The Dynamic Divine Relationship

One of the most persistent, and damaging, misconceptions derived from an overly simplistic view of biblical texts is the idea that God demands immediate, unquestioning obedience – a "do as you're told" divine authority figure. This perspective often turns faith into a series of rigid rules and blind submission, stripping away agency and critical thought. However, Exodus 4 utterly dismantles this notion. Here, we witness a robust, back-and-forth dialogue between God and Moses, a veritable argument. Moses doesn't just passively accept; he protests, he raises objections, he articulates his fears and perceived inadequacies.

Crucially, God listens. God doesn't shut Moses down or punish him for his "improper" speech, as some commentators later suggest he should have (though even the "anger" is followed by a solution, not dismissal). Instead, God responds directly to each of Moses's concerns, offering reassurance, providing tools, and ultimately, even adapting the plan by bringing Aaron into the fold. This is not about blind obedience; it's about a dynamic, responsive relationship. It teaches us that authentic spiritual engagement can, and perhaps should, involve questioning, expressing vulnerability, and even arguing our case. The divine relationship, as portrayed here, is not a monologue from on high, but a dialogue where human concerns are heard, acknowledged, and integrated into the unfolding divine plan. It’s a profound testament to a God who seeks partnership, not just submission.

Text Snapshot

But Moses spoke up and said, “What if they do not believe me and do not listen to me, but say: יהוה did not appear to you?” ... But Moses said to יהוה, “Please, O my lord, I have never been a man of words, either in times past or now that You have spoken to Your servant; I am slow of speech and slow of tongue.” ... But he said, “Please, O my lord, make someone else Your agent.” יהוה became angry with Moses and said, “There is your brother Aaron the Levite. He, I know, speaks readily."

New Angle

Insight 1: The Sacred Art of the "No, But…" – When Your Strengths Feel Like Weaknesses.

Moses, standing before the burning bush, is being offered the most pivotal role in the history of his people. Yet, what do we hear from him? Not an enthusiastic "Yes!" but a series of deeply human, profoundly relatable "no, but…" statements. “What if they do not believe me?” he asks. “I am slow of speech and slow of tongue,” he protests. Finally, a desperate plea: “Please, O my lord, make someone else Your agent.”

This isn't just simple doubt; it's an existential crisis, an identity challenge. Moses defines himself by his perceived shortcomings. He sees his lack of eloquence, his "slow of speech," not merely as a minor inconvenience but as a fundamental disqualifier for a mission that requires persuasive communication. He is grappling with imposter syndrome on a cosmic scale. How many of us, as adults, have stood at similar crossroads? A career opportunity that feels too big, a leadership role that demands skills we feel we lack, a family responsibility that seems to exceed our emotional capacity. We often self-reject, not because we genuinely can't, but because we fixate on what we don't have, on our perceived weaknesses, rather than recognizing our inherent worth or the potential for growth and divine assistance.

What's truly revolutionary here is not Moses's resistance, but God's response. God doesn't rebuke Moses for his "no," nor does God dismiss him. Instead, God engages with his "but." When Moses asks, "What if they don't believe me?", God doesn't say, "They will believe you, just have faith!" Instead, God asks, "What is that in your hand?" and then performs the signs of the rod turning into a snake and the hand becoming leprous. This is a profound lesson: God validates Moses's concern while simultaneously offering a new perspective on his capabilities and the tangible support available to him.

Consider the rod. It's a mundane shepherd's tool, an everyday object. Yet, when Moses "casts it on the ground," it becomes a terrifying snake. Then, at God's command, it transforms back into a rod. This isn't just a magic trick for the Israelites; it’s a direct response to Moses’s inner turmoil. It symbolizes how our everyday "tools" – our skills, our experiences, even the very objects we carry – can be transformed and imbued with power when brought into a larger, divine purpose. The ordinary becomes extraordinary. The familiar becomes awe-inspiring. This teaches us that the resources we already possess, however humble, are potent. The challenge isn't to acquire new, supernatural abilities out of thin air, but to see the sacred potential in what's already "in our hand."

The story continues with God directly addressing Moses's perceived verbal inadequacy: "Who gives humans speech? Who makes them dumb or deaf, seeing or blind? Is it not I, יהוה? Now go, and I will be with you as you speak and will instruct you what to say." (Exodus 4:11-12). This isn't a harsh reprimand; it's an almost tender reminder of the source of all ability. It’s God essentially saying, "You worry about your voice, but I am the architect of all voices, and I will be with yours." This is a crucial distinction. God doesn't miraculously make Moses eloquent on the spot, but promises partnership in his speech. It's a profound reassurance that divine presence compensates for human perceived lack, not by erasing the lack, but by working through it.

For adults grappling with the pressures of modern life, this narrative offers a vital counter-narrative to the pervasive myth of self-sufficiency. We live in a culture that often demands perfection, immediate competence, and unshakeable confidence. We fear vulnerability, we dread exposing our weaknesses, especially in professional or public roles. We meticulously craft personas of capability, often at great personal cost. Moses, the future liberator, provides a radical alternative: honest self-assessment, even bordering on protest, is not a disqualifier for a meaningful life or significant contribution. It is, in fact, an entry point for divine partnership. His "no, but…" opens the door for God to reveal a deeper truth about his potential and the nature of divine support.

The commentators grapple with Moses's resistance in fascinating ways. Ramban, for example, initially suggests Moses "spoke improperly" by questioning God's assurance that the people would listen. However, he then acknowledges that God responded to Moses's opinion by providing the signs, implying that even an "improper" expression of doubt can lead to a deeper revelation and provision. Sforno expands on Moses's fear, suggesting he wasn't doubting God's power, but the people's faith once they saw Pharaoh's resistance: "once the people will see that Pharaoh will refuse to let them go, they will lose faith in me." This adds another layer of complexity to Moses's "no, but…" – it’s not just about his own inadequacy, but his deeply empathetic concern for the people’s wavering belief. He's not just worried about himself; he's anticipating the psychological impact on those he's meant to lead.

Or HaChaim, while also noting the "improper" nature of Moses's flat statement ("they will definitely not believe me"), delves into Moses's profound humility. He suggests Moses couldn't fathom why he would be chosen, especially when God had promised the people would listen. Moses's doubt, in this interpretation, stems from a deep self-effacement rather than a lack of faith in God. Haamek Davar pushes this further, suggesting Moses's humility was so overwhelming that it forced him to act outside the normal bounds of decorum, to raise his voice in protest, to admit his perceived inability, even before God. He "raised a voice of weeping" because he felt utterly unable to carry out God's word. This transforms Moses's resistance from a flaw into an expression of intense, almost painful, humility and a raw, honest assessment of his own capacity.

What this teaches us is that our most profound hesitations, our "slow of speech" moments, our deepest sense of being unqualified, can be the very places where unexpected power and new possibilities are revealed. It’s a call to reframe "weakness" not as an obstacle to be overcome alone, but as a space for co-creation, a signal that divine partnership is needed and available. It invites us to consider that our "no, but…" might actually be a plea for reassurance, a cry for support, or a deeper understanding of the task, all of which God, in this narrative, is willing to provide. This matters because it gives us permission to be fully human in our spiritual and professional lives, to articulate our fears and limitations, and to discover that true strength often emerges not from our perfected self, but from our honest, vulnerable engagement with the challenges before us, knowing we are not alone.

Insight 2: The Imperfect Partnership – When "Going It Alone" Isn't the Divine Plan.

Moses’s resistance culminates in a desperate plea: “Please, O my lord, make someone else Your agent.” (Exodus 4:13). This is the breaking point. And here, something truly extraordinary happens. “יהוה became angry with Moses and said, 'There is your brother Aaron the Levite. He, I know, speaks readily. Even now he is setting out to meet you, and he will be happy to see you. You shall speak to him and put the words in his mouth—I will be with you and with him as you speak, and tell both of you what to do— and he shall speak for you to the people. Thus he shall serve as your spokesman, with you playing the role of God to him.'” (Exodus 4:14-16).

God does get angry. The text is explicit about it. But this anger is not a dismissal. It's not a divine "You're fired!" Instead, it's an exasperated, yet ultimately pragmatic, acceptance of Moses's limitation, followed by an immediate, creative solution: the introduction of Aaron. This isn't a demotion for Moses; it's a recalibration of the mission, a profound model of leadership and partnership. God doesn't force Moses to be a fluent orator; instead, God provides a partner whose strength directly complements Moses's perceived weakness. Moses, the visionary and strategist, will now "play the role of God" to Aaron, who will be his "spokesman."

This establishes a revolutionary model of leadership that challenges the pervasive myth of the self-made, solitary hero. In our modern adult lives, we are often burdened by the expectation to be all things to all people: the brilliant strategist, the charismatic speaker, the empathetic listener, the efficient manager, the perfect parent. The pressure to excel in every single area leads to burnout, imposter syndrome, and a deep sense of isolation. We are taught to overcome our weaknesses, to "pull ourselves up by our bootstraps," and to fear asking for help, lest it be perceived as a sign of inadequacy.

But this biblical narrative dismantles that myth with startling clarity. It reveals that even a divine mission, one of cosmic significance, is designed to be a team effort. Moses, despite his profound personal encounter with God, is not meant to go it alone. His "flaw" – his difficulty with public speaking – isn't an obstacle that needs to be magically removed for him to be worthy. Instead, it becomes the very space through which another person, Aaron, is brought into the sacred work. This creates a more robust, resilient, and ultimately, more successful endeavor. Moses brings the vision and the direct divine communication; Aaron brings the voice and the ability to connect with the people. Their combined strengths, born from Moses’s honest admission of weakness, create a powerful synergy that neither could achieve alone.

Think about the implications for our own lives. How many times have we struggled silently, trying to perfect a skill we're not naturally gifted at, when collaboration or delegation could have led to a far better outcome and less personal stress? This text champions the power of "us" over "me." It sanctifies the act of recognizing our limits and intentionally seeking out complementary skills in others. It suggests that true strength is not the absence of weakness, but the wisdom to build partnerships that leverage diverse talents. This applies to professional teams, family dynamics, community projects, and even personal growth. It’s about acknowledging that interdependence is not a flaw, but a fundamental aspect of human flourishing and effective action.

Furthermore, the narrative introduces another crucial partner: Zipporah, Moses’s wife. In a cryptic and unsettling passage, "At a night encampment on the way, יהוה encountered him and sought to kill him." (Exodus 4:24). The meaning of this verse is "uncertain," as Sefaria notes, but the immediate action is clear: "So Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched his legs with it, saying, “You are truly a bridegroom of blood to me!” And when [God] let him alone, she added, “A bridegroom of blood because of the circumcision.” (Exodus 4:25-26). This bizarre and dramatic interlude underscores the idea that leadership, even divine leadership, is not a solitary journey. Moses, the man chosen by God, is vulnerable and in need of saving, not by God directly, but by his quick-thinking wife. This moment, often glossed over, emphasizes the messy, lived reality of the mission. It involves family, unexpected threats, and the decisive agency of those around the leader. Zipporah, often in the background, steps forward in a moment of crisis, performing a ritual act that saves Moses’s life.

This episode, though enigmatic, is a powerful reminder that our support systems – our partners, family, friends, colleagues – are not tangential to our purpose; they are often integral to our survival and success. The sacred path is rarely a sterile, solo ascent; it is a shared, often chaotic, journey. Leaders, no matter how divinely appointed, are not immune to danger or oversight, and they rely on the vigilance and initiative of those around them. It challenges the romanticized notion of the lone hero, revealing a more complex, interwoven tapestry of relationships essential for navigating the challenges of life and mission.

Finally, the success of this partnership is clearly demonstrated at the end of the chapter: "Moses told Aaron about all the things that יהוה had committed to him and all the signs about which he had been instructed. Then Moses and Aaron went and assembled all the elders of the Israelites. Aaron repeated all the words that יהוה had spoken to Moses, and he performed the signs in the sight of those assembled, and the assembly was convinced." (Exodus 4:28-31). The partnership worked. The vision was delivered, the signs were performed, and the people were convinced. This is not just a theoretical solution; it's a proven model.

This insight matters because it liberates us from the crushing burden of perfection and self-sufficiency. It teaches us that true strength often lies not in conquering every personal weakness, but in recognizing our limits and embracing partnership. It's about the profound power of "us" over "me," the beauty of complementary skills, and the sacredness of shared responsibility in achieving a greater purpose. It gives us permission to collaborate, to delegate, to lean on others, and to celebrate the diverse talents that make any significant endeavor possible. In a world that often glorifies individual achievement, this ancient text offers a timeless wisdom: the greatest accomplishments are often forged in the crucible of imperfect, yet profound, partnership.

Low-Lift Ritual

The "Rod Reflection": Transforming the Mundane and the "Mundane You"

This week, let’s try a simple practice called the "Rod Reflection." It's designed to help you rediscover the hidden potential in your everyday "tools" and to reframe those aspects of yourself you might perceive as limitations. The goal is to spend no more than two minutes, finding pockets of quiet in your day to shift your perspective, just as Moses's ordinary shepherd's rod became a sign of divine power.

Core Idea:

The practice invites you to identify something ordinary you carry or a specific "limitation" you often focus on, and then, metaphorically, "cast it down" to see its potential for transformation, or to "grasp it by the tail" to find an unexpected new way of engaging with it.

Steps for the Week:

1. Identify Your "Rod" (15-30 seconds)

  • Option A (Object Focus): Choose a mundane object you carry or use daily. This could be your phone, a pen, your coffee mug, your car keys, a specific piece of software you use for work, or even the desk you sit at. Pick something so ordinary you rarely give it a second thought.
  • Option B (Self-Perception Focus): Alternatively, identify a "limitation" you often tell yourself you have. Perhaps, "I'm not a good public speaker," "I'm not organized enough," "I don't have enough time," "I'm not creative." This is your "slow of speech" moment.

2. "Cast it Down" (Metaphorically) (30-60 seconds)

  • If you chose an object: For a brief moment, really look at it. What is it really? Beyond its basic function, what assumptions do you make about it? What emotions or routines are associated with it? What if its primary purpose isn't the only purpose? What if it could be something else? Let your mind wander to the unexpected, the slightly absurd, the profound.
  • If you chose a self-perception: Gently acknowledge this "limitation." What does it feel like? Where does this belief come from? What fears are associated with it? Instead of trying to "fix" it, simply observe it. How does this limitation shape your actions or prevent you from opportunities?

3. "Grasp it by the Tail" (30-60 seconds)

  • If you chose an object: How might this object be seen differently? What unexpected power or potential does it hold in a new context? How might it serve a purpose you hadn't considered? For example, your phone isn't just for communication; it's a portable library, a creative studio, a connection to global knowledge. Your coffee mug isn't just for drinks; it could be a pencil holder, a small planter, or a symbolic vessel for starting your day with intention. The goal is to move beyond its obvious, comfortable definition.
  • If you chose a self-perception: How might this "limitation" actually create an opportunity? If you're "not a good public speaker," could that mean you're an excellent listener, a thoughtful writer, or a powerful collaborator who empowers others to speak? Could your "lack of time" force you to prioritize what truly matters, fostering efficiency and deeper engagement in fewer things? Could your "lack of creativity" free you to be an exceptional executor of others' visions? This is about reframing. It's about seeing how the absence of one quality might highlight or necessitate the presence of another, or create space for a partnership.

4. Small, Tangible Action (15-30 seconds)

  • What is one tiny, low-lift action you can take this week, inspired by this new perspective?
    • If your phone is your "rod," maybe spend 2 minutes using a new app for personal growth, or intentionally put it away during a meal to be fully present.
    • If your "rod" is your "slow of speech," perhaps you commit to actively listening more in a conversation, or you delegate a presentation at work to a colleague who thrives in that space, embracing the power of partnership.
    • If your "rod" is your desk, maybe you arrange one small item on it in a way that sparks joy or creativity.

Deeper Meaning:

This ritual is about cultivating a mindset of possibility and partnership. It connects directly to the Exodus narrative, where the divine (or profound meaning) is found not just in grand pronouncements, but in the transformation of the mundane. It teaches us that our perceived weaknesses or the ordinary objects in our lives are not fixed in their utility or identity. They can be reframed, repurposed, and even imbued with unexpected power when we bring intentionality, curiosity, and a willingness to see beyond the obvious. It’s about shifting from a perspective of scarcity ("I lack this," "this is just a simple object") to one of abundance and potential ("What else could this be?", "How might this limitation open a new door?"). It's a practice in finding the sacred spark in the everyday.

Troubleshooting & Variations:

  • "I feel silly doing this": That's okay! Start with a truly neutral object, like a paperclip or a piece of lint on your shirt. The less emotional baggage, the easier it is to play with the concept. The point isn't to become a magician, but to gently stretch your perception.
  • "It feels too abstract": Instead of a broad "limitation" like "not creative," pick a very specific task you dread doing. Your "rod" could be that spreadsheet, that email, or that chore. Then, "grasp it by the tail" by asking: How can I make this 1% more enjoyable, efficient, or collaborative?
  • "I'm too busy, I don't have 2 minutes": This ritual is designed for micro-moments. Do it while waiting for your coffee to brew, at a red light, during the first 30 seconds of your commute, or while waiting for a meeting to start. The short timeframe is intentional – it’s about brief, repeated shifts in perspective, not a lengthy meditation.
  • Journaling Variation: If you have a bit more time, dedicate a page in a journal to this. Write down your "rod" (object or limitation), then three different ways you could "cast it down" (reframe its current use), and three ways you could "grasp it by the tail" (discover new potential or a collaborative solution).
  • Partnership Variation (Chevruta-style): Share your "rod" (especially a perceived limitation) with a trusted friend, partner, or colleague. Ask them, "If you saw this quality in me, how might you see it as a strength or an opportunity for us to work together?" Sometimes, an external perspective can reveal potentials we're blind to in ourselves. This directly echoes God providing Aaron as a partner for Moses’s "slow of speech."

By engaging in this "Rod Reflection," even for just a minute or two, you’re not just performing a mental exercise. You are actively participating in the re-enchantment of your own life, recognizing that the extraordinary often lies hidden within the ordinary, waiting for you to simply shift your gaze and, perhaps, grasp it by the tail.

Chevruta Mini

  1. Think about a time in your adult life when you deeply resisted an opportunity or responsibility, feeling utterly unqualified or "slow of speech." What was your "no, but…" moment, and what specific reassurance or partnership did you wish someone (or even the universe) had offered you?
  2. Where in your current life – whether at work, in your family, or in a community role – are you trying to "do it all alone" when a partnership (even an imperfect, complementary one, like Moses and Aaron) might actually lead to greater success, peace, or a more profound outcome? What might be one small step towards initiating such a partnership?

Takeaway + Citations

This re-enchantment of Exodus 4 matters because it fundamentally dismantles the myth of the perfect leader and the flawless spiritual journey. It teaches us that our authentic hesitations, our perceived limitations, and our very human need for partnership are not obstacles to a meaningful life or significant contribution. Rather, they are integral parts of how profound purpose unfolds. God doesn't call the equipped; God equips the called, often through the very doubts we bring to the table and the relationships we are willing to embrace. This text gives us permission to be vulnerable, to ask for help, and to recognize that our greatest contributions might emerge not from solitary perfection, but from courageous, messy, and deeply collaborative engagement with the world.

Citations

Exodus 5
Back to lesson library

derekhlearning.com