Arukh HaShulchan, Orach Chaim 265:13-266:7

Sugya Map

• Issue: The fundamental nature of Birkat Borei Pri HaGefen within the Havdalah ceremony: Is it a birkat hahana'ah (blessing of enjoyment) or a birkat hamitzvah (blessing over a commandment)?
• Nafka Mina: The order of blessings in Havdalah (יאקנה"ז vs. יקנה"ז) and the conceptual allowance for chamar medina in place of wine.
• Primary Sources: Arukh HaShulchan OC 266:4-7; Rambam Hilchot Shabbat 29:19; Tur Orach Chaim 296; Shulchan Aruch Orach Chaim 296:8.

Text Snapshot

The Arukh HaShulchan directly quotes the Rambam: "והרמב"ם כתב וזה לשונו: 'אין אומרים על היין אלא בורא פרי הגפן תחלה, שהיא ברכת ההנאה, ואחר כך המצות'" (Arukh HaShulchan, Orach Chaim 266:4)[^1] This line is critical, as the Rambam explicitly labels Borei Pri HaGefen as a "ברכת ההנאה" – a blessing over enjoyment. The structure "ואחר כך המצות" (and afterwards the mitzvot) implies a separation between the wine's blessing and the core mitzvot of Havdalah.

Readings

• Rambam (Hilchot Shabbat 29:19): Posits that Borei Pri HaGefen is a birkat hahana'ah. This leads to his unique Havdalah order of יאקנה"ז (wine, spices, fire, havdalah), prioritizing the enjoyment of wine before the mitzvot themselves.
• Tur/Shulchan Aruch (OC 296, OC 296:8): Imply Birkat HaGefen is integral to the mitzvah or its performance, leading to the more common יקנה"ז (wine, havdalah, spices, fire) order, where Havdalah itself comes second. This suggests a different conceptualization of the wine's role.

Friction

The most potent kushya against Rambam's view is: If Birkat HaGefen is merely birkat hahana'ah, why is wine generally me'akev for Havdalah? Isn't the wine's presence more than just an "enjoyment"? The terutz lies in Rambam's broader understanding of Havdalah. The mitzvah of Havdalah is primarily the verbal declaration of separation. Wine is a hechsher mitzvah – a means to elevate its performance and bring joy, but not the mitzvah itself. This allows chamar medina when wine is unavailable (Aruch HaShulchan OC 266:1-3)[^2], as the hana'ah can be derived from other significant drinks.

Intertext

The distinction between birkat hahana'ah and birkat hamitzvah is foundational. Brachot 35a famously declares "לא נברא העולם אלא להנאת הבריות" (the world was created only for the enjoyment of creatures)[^3], which underscores the need for birkat hahana'ah. Rambam's application here is unique in its specific implication for Havdalah's structure.

Psak/Practice

While the Shulchan Aruch (OC 296:8) rules יקנה"ז, reflecting the view that Havdalah should precede the other birkat hanehenin, Rambam's approach provides a compelling conceptual framework for understanding the flexibility of Havdalah on chamar medina. It highlights that the essence of Havdalah is its declaration, not necessarily the wine.

Takeaway

The Rambam's categorization of Birkat HaGefen in Havdalah as a birkat hahana'ah offers a profound insight into the mitzvah's core identity, influencing both its blessing order and the conceptual validity of chamar medina alternatives.

---

[^1]: Arukh HaShulchan, Orach Chaim 266:4. [^2]: Arukh HaShulchan, Orach Chaim 266:1-3. [^3]: Berakhot 35a.