Daf Yomi

Chullin 93

Bite-SizedAugust 1, 2026

Sugya Map: The Status of Covered Fat

  • Issue: Does the Torah’s prohibition of chelev (Leviticus 3:3-4) extend to fat "covered by flesh" or fat "within" organs?
  • Nafka Mina: Whether specific anatomical locations require total excision (purity) or are permitted as inherently "covered."
  • Primary Sources: Chullin 93a, Rif Chullin 30b, Rashi Chullin 93a.

Text Snapshot

Chullin 93a: "The fat that is covered by the flesh is permitted. Apparently, when the Merciful One states in the Torah that the fat that is upon the loins is prohibited, it is referring only to the fat above the loins but not the fat that is inside the loins."

  • Leshon nuance: The Gemara uses the mechanics of anatomy (the animal's movement) to define the scope of the issur. The chiddush is that halakhic prohibition is subject to the physical reality of the live animal's structure.

Readings

  • Rif (Chullin 30b): Rules in accordance with Rav Asi, who permits the fat of the kidney (the "whitening" or loben). He relies on Shmuel’s principle that fat covered by flesh is exempt.
  • Rashi (Chullin 93a): Notes a regional variance. While some maintain stringency (removing the membrane and fat), he observes that in Ashkenaz, the custom is to permit it, as he considers it "fully covered."

Friction

  • Kushya: If the Torah explicitly forbids fat "on the kidneys" (Leviticus 3:4), how can we define fat "within" the kidneys as permitted?
  • Terutz: As the Gemara argues, the Torah’s mention of the kidneys inherently includes the "fat within" as part of the korban (sacrificial) ritual. Consequently, the prohibition is the "fat upon." By logical inversion, that which is internal is not part of the forbidden exterior layer.

Intertext

  • Compare with Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah 64:1, which codifies the removal of the chelev but acknowledges the custom regarding loben ha-kulyah. The tension remains between minhag (customary stringency) and the sugya's baseline leniency.

Psak/Practice

The halakha generally follows the principle that fat covered by flesh is permitted. However, in the context of niqur (porging), the standard is to be stringent regarding the loben ha-kulyah (the white membrane/fat on the kidney) where potential for error is high. The meta-psak here is clear: empirical anatomy dictates the boundaries of the Torah’s prohibition.

Takeaway

Halakhic prohibition is not merely categorical but anatomical; where the Torah defines the limit of an issur by a location ("on the loin"), it implicitly excludes the interior.