Daily Mishnah · Expert – Beit Midrash Analysis · Standard
Mishnah Kelim 12:2-3
Sugya Map
The core of our inquiry in Mishnah Kelim 12:2 and Mishnah Kelim 12:3 centers on the ontological status of metal accessories (tfeilot) and repurposed implements. The sugya maps out the boundaries of functional form (tzurat keli), exploring when a metal piece possesses independent vessel status and when its status is entirely subsumed by the primary vessel to which it is attached.
[Metal Appendage / Accessory]
|
+------------------+------------------+
| |
[Attached to Vessel] [Detached / Standalone]
| |
Does primary vessel Is it a "keli" on its own?
have susceptibility? |
/ \ +--------+--------+
[Yes] [No] | |
| | [Has Indep. Use] [No Indep. Use]
(Tamei) (Tahor) (e.g., Key) (e.g., Hook)
| |
(Tamei) (Tahor)
Core Issues
- The Metaphysics of Chibbur (Connection): Does an auxiliary metal component (like a hook or chain) lose its independent identity when attached to a primary vessel, or does it merely share its status through mechanical connection?
- The Standard of Ma'aseh (Physical Action) vs. Yichud (Mental Designation): When repurposing a non-susceptible object (such as a construction nail or an invalidated coin), what level of physical modification is required to catalyze susceptibility to impurity (tumah)?
- The Ontology of Currency: How does a coin transition from a non-susceptible abstract token of value (mamon) into a functional, tangible vessel (keli)?
Nafka Minot (Practical Halachic Ramifications)
- The Susceptibility of Metal Components on Wooden Vessels: If a metal hook is attached to a wooden vessel that is flat and therefore immune to impurity (pashut klei etz), does the metal hook retain its susceptibility as a metal vessel (pashut klei matacht), or is it nullified (batel) to the wooden host?
- The Status of Detached Accessories: If a hook or chain that was previously attached to a vessel is removed, does it instantly revert to a state of purity, or does its history of utility preserve its susceptibility?
- The Threshold of Metallurgical Modification (Chasimah): Does a nail bent to serve as a key require tempering and hardening to contract tumah, or does the mere physical bending suffice?
Primary Sources
- Mishnah Kelim 12:2-3
- Rambam, Commentary on the Mishnah, Mishnah Kelim 12:2, Mishnah Kelim 12:3
- Rash MiShantz, Mishnah Kelim 12:2
- Tosafot Yom Tov on Mishnah Kelim 12:2:1, Mishnah Kelim 12:2:2
- Mishnah Kelim 11:2 (for comparative analysis of metal-wood composites)
Full Experience in the App
Listen. Chat. Go deeper.
Audio playback, interactive chevruta, Hebrew tools, and every daily learning track — only in Derekh Learning.
Text Snapshot
זֶה הַכְּלָל: כָּל שֶׁהוּא חִבּוּר לִכְלִי טָמֵא – טָמֵא; לִחְבּוּר לִכְלִי טָהוֹר – טָהוֹר. וְכוּלָּן בִּפְנֵי עַצְמָן – טְהוֹרִין.
"This is the general rule: any [hook] that is attached to a susceptible [literally, 'impure'] vessel is susceptible; but one that is attached to a vessel that is not susceptible [literally, 'pure'] is clean. All these, however, are by themselves clean." — Mishnah Kelim 12:2
Linguistic and Grammatical Nuances
- "חִבּוּר" (Chibbur): The Mishnah does not write מחובר (connected to), but rather חִבּוּר (a connection/attachment). This nominal form suggests that the accessory does not merely happen to be physically connected; rather, its very essence and classification is defined as "an attachment." It has no independent existence.
- "בִּפְנֵי עַצְמָן" (Bifnei Atzman): Literally, "in their own faces." This indicates ontological independence. When detached, these items lack the necessary "face"—the recognizable, self-contained identity (shem keli)—required to support the status of susceptibility.
- "טְהוֹרִין" (Tehorin): In the context of Hilchot Kelim, tahor does not merely mean "currently free of impurity," but rather אינו מקבל טומאה (non-susceptible to contracting impurity).
Readings
1. The Onkiyot vs. Unkaliyot Lexical and Conceptual Schism
The text of Mishnah Kelim 12:2 opens with a dispute regarding the balance of a wool-comber:
קְנֵה הַמֹּאזְנַיִם שֶׁל סָרוֹקוֹת טָמֵא מִפְּנֵי הָאוּנְקְלִיּוֹת.
This is the standard reading of our Mishnah: "The beam of a wool-combers' balance is susceptible to impurity on account of the unkaliyot (hooks)." However, both the Rash MiShantz and the Rambam preserve a radically different textual variant.
"אבל הרמב"ם והר"ש גרסי אונקיות. וזה לשון הר"ש: אונקיות הם כף של מאזנים ויש להן בית קבול שעשויין כמין כוס קטן."
"But the Rambam and the Rash read 'onkiyot' (ounces/cups). And this is the language of the Rash: 'Onkiyot' are the pans of the scales, which have a receptacle, made like a small cup." — Tosafot Yom Tov on Mishnah Kelim 12:2:1
This textual variant is not merely orthographic; it represents two fundamentally different ways of conceptualizing the mechanics of susceptibility in scale beams:
- The Rash's "Onkiyot" (Cups/Receptacles) Model: Under this reading, the metal beam of the scale is susceptible only because it is structurally integrated with cups that possess a receptacle (beit kibbul). The cups are classic kelim that contract tumah due to their containment capacity. The beam, which is merely a flat piece of metal (pashut klei matacht), becomes susceptible only because it is a chibbur (attachment) to these cups.
- The Rambam's "Unkaliyot" (Hooks) Model: The Rambam reads unkaliyot (hooks). A hook is a flat, non-receptacle metal appendage (pashut). Despite lacking a beit kibbul, the hook is susceptible because it performs an active, dynamic utility—gripping and suspending objects. The beam of the wool-comber's balance is susceptible because of these functional hooks.
The underlying conceptual debate (lomdis) here is whether metal vessels require a classic "receptacle" framework to trigger susceptibility when they are parts of a composite tool, or if any highly functional, shape-retaining metal appendage (keli fecht) can serve as the anchor of impurity for the entire apparatus.
The Rash anchors susceptibility in the classic paradigm of beit kibbul (the cup of the scale), while the Rambam expands susceptibility to the functional mechanics of suspension (the hook).
Rash's Model: [Scale Beam] ---> Attached to ---> [Cups (Receptacle)] ===> Susceptible (Classic Tumah)
Rambam's Model: [Scale Beam] ---> Attached to ---> [Hooks (Suspension)] ===> Susceptible (Functional Tumah)
2. The Professionalization of Utility: Maharam of Rothenburg's Distinction
A secondary friction arises in the continuation of the Mishnah: "And that of a householder, if it has hooks (onkiyot), is also susceptible." Why does the Mishnah assume a professional wool-comber's balance is inherently susceptible, whereas a householder's balance requires the explicit presence of hooks or cups to be rendered susceptible?
The Maharam of Rothenburg, cited by the Tosafot Yom Tov, provides a brilliant resolution that uncovers the sociological-halachic boundaries of vessel definition:
"ונ"ל דס"ל סרוקות כולן יש להן אונקיות... אבל של בעלי בתים שאינן רגילים לשקול כל כך, יש שיש להם מאזנים שאין בית קבול לכפות מאזנים... להכי נקט אם יש בהן אונקיות טמאה."
"And it seems to me that [the Mishnah] holds that all professional wool-comber balances have 'onkiyot' (cups/hooks)... but householders, who do not weigh items frequently, sometimes possess scales that lack a receptacle for the pans... therefore it specifies that [the householder's scale] is only susceptible if it has 'onkiyot'." — Tosafot Yom Tov on Mishnah Kelim 12:2:2
The Maharam introduces a major principle: Professional tools possess a standardized, teleological definition that presumes maximum utility. Because a professional wool-comber must weigh wool with high precision, their instrument is manufactured with functional cups or hooks. Therefore, the law assigns susceptibility to the professional balance as an objective, inherent status (סתמא לקבלת טומאה).
Conversely, a householder's implement is highly variable and lacks a standardized professional form. Its utility is fluid. Because it might be used merely for crude, non-precise balancing without receptacles (such as weighing milk or heavy bundles with a simple wooden bar), it does not acquire an automatic status. Its susceptibility is not assumed; it must be proven by the physical presence of the onkiyot.
This distinction establishes that susceptibility is not merely a function of physical material, but of standardized social utility. Professional use (tashmish uman) elevates and fixes the metaphysical status of a vessel, whereas domestic use (tashmish ba'al habayit) leaves the vessel's status fluid until a physical component anchors its identity.
3. Rambam's Ontological Framework of "Tfeilah" (Auxiliaries)
In his commentary, the Rambam formulates a fundamental law regarding the ontology of attachments:
"וכאשר היה האונקלי לבדו קודם שידבק בכלי אשר נעשה אליו הנה הוא טהור ולא יקבל טומאה... לפי שהוא סמוך אל זולתו ואין לו שם בפני עצמו, והנה הוא כאילו חלק מכלי לא כלי שלם, והבן זה."
"And when the hook is by itself, before it is attached to the vessel for which it was made, it is clean and cannot contract impurity... because it is dependent upon something else and has no independent name of its own; thus, it is as if it is merely a part of a vessel, not a complete vessel. Understand this." — Rambam, Commentary on Mishnah Kelim 12:2:1
The Rambam demands that we distinguish between a keli gamur (a complete, self-contained vessel) and a cheftza d'tfeilah (an auxiliary object). A metal hook, though fully formed of iron, is ontologically incomplete because its teleology is entirely dependent upon a host vessel.
Because it "has no independent name" (ein lo shem בפני עצמו), it cannot serve as a locus of tumah. It is a metaphysical non-entity when detached.
[Metal Hook (Detached)]
|
Is there an independent name? (No)
|
=============================
Ontological Status: Non-Entity
Halachic Status: Clean (Tahor)
=============================
|
(Attached to Host Vessel)
|
==================================
Ontological Status: Subsumed Part
Halachic Status: Shares Host Status
==================================
This chiddush changes how we understand physical completeness. An object may be physically complete—smooth, polished, and sharp—but if its functional destiny is to be auxiliary to another object, it remains halachically "unformed" (golem) until it is physically integrated with its host.
4. The Functional Shield: Rabban Gamaliel vs. The Sages on Basket Covers
In Mishnah Kelim 12:3, we encounter a sharp dispute regarding the metal cover of a householder's basket:
"חִפּוּי הַסַּל שֶׁל מַתָּכֶת שֶׁל בַּעֲלֵי בָתִּים – רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל מְטַמֵּא, וַחֲכָמִים מְטַהֲרִין."
"The metal cover of a basket of householders: Rabban Gamaliel says it is susceptible to impurity, but the Sages say that it is clean." — Mishnah Kelim 12:3
To understand the mechanics of this dispute, we must analyze why both parties agree that a physician's metal basket cover is susceptible (של רופאים טמא), while they split on a householder's basket cover.
- The Sages' View: A householder's basket cover is a flat piece of metal (pashut klei matacht). It does not serve as a receptacle; its sole function is to cover and protect the basket's contents. Because it is merely a protective barrier, it does not possess a significant independent utility (tashmish chashuv). It is therefore tahor.
- Rabban Gamaliel's View: Even though it is flat, a metal cover for a householder's basket is highly crafted and durable. It is used not just as a cover, but often as a tray to hold items temporarily. This dual utility elevates it to the status of an independent vessel, rendering it susceptible.
- The Case of the Physician's Basket Cover: Why do both agree it is tamei? A physician's basket contains surgical instruments, bandages, and medicines. The metal cover of such a basket is constantly used as an active medical surface—a sterile tray upon which the physician places instruments during a procedure. It is an integral part of the clinical operation, meaning its functional utility is highly significant (tashmish chashuv).
This dispute clarifies that the line between a mere "cover" (which is tahor as a flat accessory) and a "vessel" (which is tamei) is drawn by the intensity and significance of its active use. The Sages require the active use to be professional and consistent (as with the physician), while Rabban Gamaliel argues that even domestic, occasional use (as with the householder) is sufficient to grant the metal cover independent halachic standing.
Friction
Kushya 1: The Paradox of the Detached Hook
The Mishnah states a sweeping rule:
"וכולן בפני עצמן – טהורין"
"And all of these, by themselves, are clean." — Mishnah Kelim 12:2
This includes hooks, chains, and rings.
This presents a major difficulty: Biblical law dictates that metal vessels, even flat ones (pashutei klei matacht), are susceptible to tumah (unlike flat wooden vessels). A metal hook is a finished, functional metal object. It is used for hanging, pulling, or fastening.
If a simple metal key or a needle is susceptible to tumah on its own, why is a detached hook tahor? Why does it require connection to a host vessel to become susceptible?
Terutz A: Rambam's Ontological Lack of "Shem Keli"
The Rambam addresses this paradox by arguing that susceptibility requires a vessel to possess an independent, self-contained functional identity—a shem בפני עצמו.
A needle, though small, performs its entire function (sewing) independently. A key, though small, performs its function (unlocking) independently.
A hook, by contrast, has no independent utility. It cannot hang anything unless it is anchored to a wall or a vessel. Because its utility is inherently relational, it lacks a shem keli when detached. It is not a "vessel" but a "part of a vessel."
Until it is attached, its manufacturing process is conceptually incomplete (מחוסר מלאכה). The act of attaching it is what completes its manufacture (gmar melacha).
[Needle / Key] ===> Performs function independently ===> Has "Shem Keli" ===> Susceptible
[Detached Hook] ===> Cannot function unless anchored ===> Lacks "Shem Keli" ===> Pure
Terutz B: The Chazon Ish's Resolution on "Tashmish" vs. "Keli"
The Chazon Ish (Kelim) refines this point. He distinguishes between:
- An object whose function is active (תשמיש עצמי), like a knife or key.
- An object whose function is connective (תשמיש משמש), like a hook or chain.
A connective metal object is never classified as an independent keli because its entire purpose is to serve as a bridge between two other entities. If it is detached, it is in a state of suspended animation—it has no active functional status.
Therefore, it is tahor by itself. It only acquires susceptibility when it is integrated into a system of active utility by being attached to a primary vessel.
Kushya 2: Designation (Yichud) vs. Physical Alteration (Tikkun Ma'aseh)
In Mishnah Kelim 12:3, we find a dispute regarding a nail adapted for opening jars:
"מסמר שתיקנו לפתוח בו את החבית – רבי עקיבא מטמא, וחכמים מטהרין עד שיחסום."
"A nail which he adapted to open a jar: Rabbi Akiva says that it is susceptible to impurity, but the Sages say that it is clean unless he forges [or hardens] it." — Mishnah Kelim 12:3
This presents a serious contradiction with established principles in Hilchot Kelim. Generally, if a person takes a raw or repurposed item and merely designates it (yichud) or performs a minor physical adjustment (tikkun), that is sufficient to render it a functional vessel. For example, if one takes a stone and designates it for use as a weight, it becomes susceptible.
Why, then, do the Sages require chasimah (the metallurgical process of forging, tempering, or hardening) to make the jar-opening nail susceptible? Why is the user's physical adaptation (תיקנו) of bending or sharpening the nail insufficient?
Terutz A: The Rashba's "Structural Inertia" of Construction Materials
The Rashba (in his Chiddushim) explains that a nail has a powerful, pre-existing halachic identity: it is a construction fastener designed to be driven into a wall or building. Once driven into a building, it is nullified to the ground (batel l'karka) and is completely immune to tumah.
Because the nail begins its life with this strong structural identity, a simple, minor physical adjustment (tikkun kal) is not powerful enough to strip it of its "construction" status and transform it into an independent tool.
The Sages require a radical, irreversible metallurgical act—chasimah (tempering the metal to make it a durable tool)—to legally "sever" its identity as a structural fastener.
Without chasimah, it remains a "nail" that was temporarily bent, and a nail is not an independent vessel. Rabbi Akiva, however, holds that any physical change (ma'aseh) that makes it fit for its new task is sufficient to override its original designation.
[Construction Nail] ---> High structural inertia (Batel l'karka)
|
+------------+------------+
| |
[Sages' Requirement] [R' Akiva's View]
| |
Must undergo "Chasimah" Minor physical "Tikkun"
(Radical forging) (Bending/sharpening)
to sever original identity is sufficient
| |
= Susceptible = = Susceptible =
Terutz B: The Rav Chaim Soloveitchik Distinction on "Shavyei l'Mana"
Using the conceptual framework of Rav Chaim Soloveitchik, we can distinguish between two distinct tracks of vessel creation:
- Creating a vessel from raw materials (שוויה למנא מעיקרא): Here, even a minor act of completion is sufficient, as there is no competing identity.
- Converting an existing, non-susceptible object into a susceptible one (מהפך מאיסור להיתר / כלי אחר): When an object already exists in a finished, non-susceptible state (like a nail, which was fully manufactured to be a fastener), converting it into a susceptible tool requires a higher standard of physical modification.
The Sages hold that mere bending is classified as a temporary modification (שינוי הפיך). Because the nail can easily be bent back and used as a standard fastener, its structural identity has not been fundamentally altered.
Only chasimah—which permanently alters the physical properties of the metal, making it too brittle or too hard to be used as a standard nail—acts as a true gmar melacha for its new identity as a jar-opener.
Intertext
Parallel 1: The Metamorphosis of Invalidated Currency
Mishnah Kelim 12:3 introduces a fascinating halachic transition:
"דִּינָר שֶׁנִּפְסַל וְהִתְקִינוֹ לִהְיוֹת תּוֹלֶה בְּצַוַּאר קְטַנָּה – טָמֵא. סֶלַע שֶׁנִּפְסְלָה וְהִתְקִינָהּ לִהְיוֹת מִשְׁקוֹלֶת – טְמֵאָה."
"If a dinar had been invalidated and then was adapted for hanging around a young girl's neck, it is susceptible to impurity. So, too, if a sela had been invalidated and was adapted for use as a weight, it is susceptible." — Mishnah Kelim 12:3
This text must be read in conversation with Mishnah Bava Metzia 4:5, which defines the legal boundaries of currency (matbe'ach) versus commodity (peirot), and the Gemara in Bava Kamma 97b regarding invalidated coins.
The fundamental rule of currency in Hilchot Tumah is that functional coins are immune to impurity. Why? A coin is not a "vessel" (keli); its value is abstract and representative. It is a tool of exchange (mamon), not a tool of physical utility. Its physical form is secondary to the sovereign decree that grants it purchasing power.
However, once a coin is "invalidated" (sh'nifsal)—either because the government demonetized it or because its weight depreciated beyond the legal limit (as the Mishnah notes: "As much as two denars")—its abstract monetary identity is stripped away. It is now reduced to raw metal.
[Active Coin]
|
Has abstract monetary status (Mamon)
Immune to Impurity (No "Shem Keli")
|
(Demonetized)
|
[Invalidated Coin]
|
Reduced to raw metal (No value)
|
(Adapted as weight / jewelry)
|
Acquires functional identity (Keli)
Susceptible to Impurity
If a person then performs an act of tikkun (adaptation)—such as drilling a hole in the dinar to hang it as jewelry, or using the heavy sela as a weight—it enters the realm of kelim.
The conceptual focus here is that monetary status (shem mamon) and vessel status (shem keli) are mutually exclusive. As long as the coin is valid currency, its monetary identity "blocks" any potential vessel identity. Only when it is invalidated can it undergo a metamorphosis and become a susceptible vessel.
Parallel 2: The Unified Field Theory of "Chibbur" in Kelim
To fully comprehend the general rule of chibbur in Mishnah Kelim 12:2 ("any hook that is attached to a susceptible vessel is susceptible..."), we must compare it to Mishnah Kelim 11:2:
"טַבְלָה שֶׁעֲשָׂאָהּ מַתָּכֶת, וְהַנִּקְלִיטִין שֶׁלָּהּ עֵץ – טְהוֹרָה. עֲשָׂאָהּ עֵץ, וְהַנִּקְלִיטִין שֶׁלָּהּ מַתָּכֶת – טְמֵאָה."
"A table that was made of metal, but its legs were wood, is pure [if the metal part is flat]. If it was made of wood, and its legs were metal, it is susceptible." — Mishnah Kelim 11:2
These sources together establish a unified field theory of composite vessels (kelim murkavim) in Halacha:
- The Principle of the Primary (Ikar) and the Secondary (Shammash): When metal and wood are joined, we do not view them as two equal components. We identify which component performs the primary function of the vessel (ikar) and which serves as the auxiliary helper (shammash).
- The Rule of Nullification (Bittul): In Mishnah Kelim 12:2, the metal hook attached to a wooden vessel is nullified to the wooden vessel. If the wooden vessel is tahor (such as a flat tray), the metal hook—despite being metal—becomes tahor. The secondary component is completely absorbed into the legal status of the primary host.
This prevents a chaotic reality where different parts of a single integrated object hold conflicting halachic statuses. The physical connection (chibbur) creates a singular metaphysical entity (guf echad), governed entirely by the status of the primary host.
Psak/Practice
Rambam's Codification in Hilchot Kelim
The Rambam codifies the rulings of our Mishnayot with high precision in his Yad HaChazakah:
"כָּל אֻנְקְלִי שֶׁהִיא חִבּוּר לִכְלִי שֶׁמְּקַבֵּל טֻמְאָה, הֲרֵי הִיא כָּמוֹהוּ וּמְקַבֶּלֶת טֻמְאָה; וְאִם הָיְתָה חִבּוּר לִכְלִי שֶׁאֵינוֹ מְקַבֵּל טֻמְאָה, הֲרֵי הִיא טְהוֹרָה. וְכָל הָאֻנְקְלִיּוֹת כֻּלָּן כְּשֶׁהֵן בִּפְנֵי עַצְמָן, טְהוֹרִין."
"Any hook that is attached to a vessel that is susceptible to impurity is like it and is susceptible; and if it was attached to a vessel that is not susceptible, it is pure. And all hooks, when they are by themselves, are pure." — Rambam, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Kelim 8:1
The Rambam also rules in accordance with the Sages against Rabbi Akiva regarding the jar-opening nail:
"מַסְמֵר שֶׁתִּקְּנוֹ לִפְתֹּחַ בּוֹ אֶת הַחָבִית, עֲדַיִן הוּא טָהוֹר עַד שֶׁיַּחְסֹם אוֹתוֹ, שֶׁמִּפְּנֵי שֶׁהָיָה מַסְמֵר הַבִּנְיָן, אֵין מַעֲשֶׂה קַל מְשַׁנֶּה שְׁמוֹ."
"A nail which he adapted to open a jar remains pure until he forges it; because it was originally a construction nail, a minor action cannot change its name [status]." — Rambam, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Kelim 9:2
Contemporary Applications: Removable Components and Modular Utensils
While the laws of ritual impurity (tumah and taharah) are not fully active in the absence of the Beit HaMikdash, the metaphysical principles of chibbur (connection) and tfeilah (auxiliary status) developed in our sugya remain highly relevant to contemporary halachic practice, particularly regarding Tevilat Kelim (the immersion of newly acquired metal or glass food vessels in a mikveh).
[Composite Food Utensil]
(e.g., Plastic Kettle with
Removable Metal Element)
|
Does the metal element require immersion?
|
+--------------------+--------------------+
| |
[Is it an "Ikar"?] [Is it a "Tfeilah"?]
| |
Does it perform the Is it auxiliary to the
primary function (heating)? non-susceptible body?
| |
====================== ======================
Requires Immersion Exempt from Immersion
====================== ======================
1. Modular Kitchen Appliances
Consider a modern electric kettle made of plastic (which is exempt from tevilat kelim according to many authorities) that contains a removable metal heating element, or a food processor with a plastic bowl and a removable metal blade.
Based on the general rule in Mishnah Kelim 12:2 (כל שהוא חבור לכלי טהור – טהור), one might argue that since the metal blade or heating element is attached to a non-susceptible plastic host, it should be exempt from immersion.
However, contemporary authorities (such as the Minchat Yitzchak and Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach) apply our sugya's distinction:
- If the metal component is the primary functional element of the appliance (ikar ha-tashmish), it cannot be considered nullified (batel) to the plastic body.
- Unlike the hook in the Mishnah—which has no independent utility and is therefore tfeilah—the metal blade of a blender performs the primary task of cutting.
- Therefore, it retains its independent status as a metal vessel and requires immersion with a blessing, even though it is physically attached to a plastic host.
2. Detachable Handles and Straps
If a metal handle on a ceramic pot is designed to be easily detached for cleaning:
- If the handle is detached at the time of purchase, does it require immersion by itself?
- According to the Rambam's rule (וכולן בפני עצמן טהורין), a detached handle has no independent shem keli (identity) and is immune to tumah.
- Therefore, the Rama rules (Yoreh Deah 120:13) that detached auxiliary parts do not require immersion on their own. They must only be immersed when integrated with the primary vessel.
Takeaway
Halachic utility is not merely a physical state, but an ontological status. An object's susceptibility to impurity is determined by whether it possesses an independent functional identity (shem בפני עצמו) or is legally nullified to a host vessel as a secondary attachment (tfeilah).
derekhlearning.com