Mishneh Torah, Kings and Wars 1-3

Sugya Map

Issue

The nuanced role and conditions of royal anointing (meshiach) for a king's successor.

Nafka Mina(s)

When is anointing required for an heir, and for what purpose (establishing legitimacy vs. resolving dispute)?

Primary Sources

Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 1:7, 1:10, 1:12; Keritot 5b.

Text Snapshot

Rambam teaches:

"מָשְׁחוּ שְׁלֹמֹה מִפְּנֵי מַחֲלֹקֶת אֲדֹנִיָּה, וְיוֹאָשׁ מִפְּנֵי עֲתַלְיָה, וּמָשְׁחוּ יְהוֹאָחָז מִפְּנֵי יְהוֹיָקִים אָחִיו."^1(#fn1) (They anointed Solomon because of Adoniyahu's dispute, and Jehoash because of Atalyah, and Jehoachaz because of his brother Yehoyakim.)

Dikduk/Leshon Nuance

The repetitive "מפני" (because of) highlights the causal nature of these anointings. It implies that for a Davidic heir, anointing is not a normative succession ritual, but an extraordinary measure specifically triggered by a challenge to the throne, underscoring its role as a dispute-resolution mechanism.

Readings

Rambam (MT Kings 1:12)

Chiddush: Anointing for a succeeding Davidic king is generally not required for legitimacy; it's performed solely to resolve a "מחלוקת" (dispute) or "מלחמת אחים" (civil war). Kingship is hereditary, but anointing publically affirms the rightful heir.

Rashi (Keritot 5b s.v. "מפני המחלוקת")

Chiddush: The purpose of such an anointing is "כדי שיטיל אימה על המלכות ולא יערערו עליו" (to instill awe of the monarchy and prevent challenges). This emphasizes the anointing's pragmatic, declarative function in securing power.

Friction

Kushya

If Davidic kingship is hereditary and "עד עולם,"^2(#fn2) as Rambam states^3(#fn3), why is any anointing necessary for an heir, even amidst dispute? Doesn't inherited legitimacy suffice?

Terutz

The anointing in these cases doesn't confer kingship de novo, but publicly affirms and solidifies the rightful heir's position. It's a symbolic act to assert authority and quell dissent, "להטיל אימה"^4(#fn4) and deter challengers, blending divine mandate with practical governance.

Intertext

I Samuel 16:13

"וַיִּקַּח שְׁמוּאֵל אֶת קֶרֶן הַשֶּׁמֶן וַיִּמְשַׁח אֹתוֹ... וַתִּצְלַח רוּחַ ה' אֶל דָּוִד מֵהַיּוֹם הַהוּא וָהָלְאָה." (Samuel took the horn of oil and anointed him... and the spirit of God came mightily upon David from that day forward.) This highlights the initial anointing as a singular, foundational divine act, distinct from later, dispute-driven affirmations.

Psak/Practice

Rambam's ruling implies Davidic kingship's halachic basis is inheritance. Subsequent anointing is a meta-halachic mechanism for practical governance and stability, showing that even divinely ordained roles require pragmatic measures to function effectively in the human realm.

Takeaway

Royal anointing serves dual functions: foundational establishment of a dynasty, and, for heirs, a pragmatic act to resolve disputes and consolidate power, bridging divine ideal with political reality.

---

Footnotes:

1. Mishneh Torah, Kings and Wars 1:12.
2. II Samuel 7:16.
3. Mishneh Torah, Kings and Wars 1:7.
4. Rashi on Keritot 5b s.v. "מפני המחלוקת".