Daily Rambam
Mishneh Torah, Marriage 3
In another voice
Sugya Map
- Issue: The formal requirements for Kiddushin (betrothal) via Kesef (money) vs. Shtar (document).
- Core Question: Is the man’s verbal declaration merely a clarification of intent, or a constituent act of the legal acquisition?
- Nafka Mina: If a man gives money without a verbal declaration (but in context of prior discussion), is the marriage binding?
- Primary Sources: Deuteronomy 24:1, Kiddushin 2a, Mishneh Torah, Marriage 3:1.
Listen to this lesson. Ask it questions.
Audio, a chevruta that cites its sources, Hebrew tools, and every daily cycle, in the app.
Text Snapshot
Rambam, Mishneh Torah, Marriage 3:1: "It is the man who makes the statement that implies that he acquires the woman as his wife, and it is he who gives her the money."
- Leshon Nuance: The Rambam insists the ish (man) must be the actor. The dikduk here is precise: Kiddushin is an act of kinyan (acquisition), and in the binary of active agent versus passive object, the ish must precipitate the bond.
Readings
- Ohr Sameach (3:1): Notes that while the man must say "You are consecrated to me" (mekudeshet li), the Rambam omits the word "with this" (b'zeh) when discussing Shtar. He argues that for a document, the act of writing l'shmah (for her sake) is so definitive that the document itself functions as the kinyan, whereas money requires verbal attachment to ensure the intent is not misconstrued.
- Sha'ar HaMelekh (3:10): Delves into the safek regarding complex acquisitions (e.g., "half a woman"). He highlights the tension between formalistic kinyan and the reality that kiddushin can be safek (doubtful), requiring a get (divorce) even if the legal criteria aren't fully met—a protective hedge for the woman.
Friction
- Kushya: If kiddushin is a kinyan like any other, why does the Sages' requirement for the woman's consent (in cases of a minor or agent) complicate the status?
- Terutz: The Rambam differentiates between the legal act of the man and the personal consent of the woman. The bond is a synthesis; the man provides the kinyan, but the woman’s consent acts as the "reception" that completes the legal status.
Intertext
- Deuteronomy 24:2 (The link between Get and Kiddushin via "leaving" and "going").
- Shulchan Aruch, Even HaEzer 27:8 (Codifying the safek status where prior discussion mitigates missing verbal formulas).
Psak/Practice
The chuppah (wedding canopy) is today's primary kinyan. Per the Rambam, the blessing is recited before the act. If one neglects the blessing, it is not repeated post-facto (unlike other mitzvot), because the legal status of the marriage is already finalized upon the transfer of the ring.
Takeaway
Kiddushin is not just a contract; it is a formal kinyan that requires both a clear, active declaration by the man and the existential consent of the woman.
Tomorrow's lesson, already explained.
Today's is done. Tomorrow morning's arrives the same way: one short, source-cited email on the day's page. Every day of the cycle has one.
derekhlearning.com