Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14

Sugya Map

• Issue: The Halachic source and scope of various gmilut chasadim (acts of kindness), particularly bikur cholim (visiting the sick) and nichum aveilim (comforting mourners). Is their obligation mid'Oraita (Scriptural) or mid'Rabbanan (Rabbinic)? What is the nature of gmilut chasadim sheb'gufo (personal kindnesses) and their shiur (measure/limit)?
• Nafka Mina(s):
  • The severity of transgression for neglecting these mitzvot (e.g., "as if he shed blood" for not accompanying guests or visiting the sick).
  • The extent of bitul Torah permitted for their performance.
  • Whether one is kofin (compelled) to perform them, and the nature of that compulsion.
  • The applicability of ona'at devarim (verbal oppression) or chillul Hashem (desecration of God's name) to their neglect.
  • The philosophical underpinning of gmilut chasadim as a manifestation of "Love your neighbor as yourself."
• Primary Sources:
  • Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Avel 14:1ff.
  • Vayikra 19:18 ("Love your neighbor as yourself").
  • Mishnah Pe'ah 1:1.
  • Yerushalmi Pe'ah 1:1.
  • Sanhedrin 70b (the sugya of ben Soma and chaburat mitzvah).
  • Sotah 14a (on hachnasat orchim).

Text Snapshot

The Rambam opens Hilchot Avel Perek 14 with a foundational statement regarding the mitzvot of gmilut chasadim:

מִצְוַת עֲשֵׂה שֶׁל דִּבְרֵיהֶם לְבַקֵּר חוֹלִים וּלְנַחֵם אֲבֵלִים לְהוֹצִיא הַמֵּת וּלְהַכְנִיס הַכַּלָּה וּלְלַוּוֹת אוֹרְחִים וּלְהִתְעַסֵּק בְּכָל צָרְכֵי הַקְּבוּרָה לִשָּׂא בַּכָּתֵף וְלֵילֵךְ לִפְנֵי הַמִּטָּה וְלִסְפּוֹד וְלַחְפּוֹר וְלִקְבּוֹר וְכֵן לְשַׂמַּח חָתָן וְכַלָּה וּלְסַעֵד בְּכָל צָרְכֵיהֶן. וְאֵלּוּ הֵן גְּמִילוּת חֲסָדִים שֶׁבְּגוּפוֹ שֶׁאֵין לָהֶן שִׁעוּר. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁכָּל מִצְוֹת אֵלּוּ מִדִּבְרֵיהֶם הֲרֵי הֵן בִּכְלַל (ויקרא יט יח) "וְאָהַבְתָּ לְרֵעֲךָ כָּמוֹךָ" כְּלוֹמַר כָּל דָּבָר שֶׁאַתָּה רוֹצֶה שֶׁיַּעֲשׂוּ אוֹתָן לְךָ עֲשֵׂה אַתָּה לַחֲבֵרְךָ בַּתּוֹרָה וּבַמִּצְוֹת.

"It is a positive commandment of Rabbinic origin to visit the sick, comfort mourners... These are deeds of kindness that one carries out with his person that have no limit. Although all these mitzvot are of Rabbinic origin, they are included in the Scriptural commandment Leviticus 19:18: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' That charge implies that whatever you would like other people to do for you, you should do for your comrade in the Torah and mitzvot."

--- Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14:1

Dikduk/Leshon Nuance: The phrase "מִצְוַת עֲשֵׂה שֶׁל דִּבְרֵיהֶם" (a positive commandment of Rabbinic origin) sets the stage immediately, categorizing these fundamental acts. The subsequent "אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁכָּל מִצְוֹת אֵלּוּ מִדִּבְרֵיהֶם הֲרֵי הֵן בִּכְלַל... וְאָהַבְתָּ לְרֵעֲךָ כָּמוֹךָ" is crucial. It acknowledges the Scriptural source for the concept of neighborly love, while still maintaining the Rabbinic status of the specific mitzvot. This implies a meta-obligation or a general principle from which the Rabbinic enactments derive their spirit and perhaps their chizuk (strengthening). The phrase "שאין להן שיעור" (that have no limit) for gmilut chasadim sheb'gufo is also a significant declaration, distinguishing them from monetary mitzvot which often have limits.

Readings

Rav Yosef Karo, Kessef Mishneh (KM)

The Kessef Mishneh¹, commenting on Rambam's statement that these mitzvot are mid'Rabbanan, notes that the Rambam does not provide an explicit source for this classification here. However, he references the Rambam's own statement in Hilchot Mamrim 7:2, where the Rambam also refers to tanchumei aveilim as a mitzvat d'Rabbanan. This indicates that the classification is consistent within the Rambam's oeuvre. The Kessef Mishneh implicitly agrees with the Rambam's classification and does not raise an immediate challenge, suggesting it's a known position.

Ramban, Hasagot al Sefer HaMitzvot, Shoresh Rishon, Teshuvah 3

The Ramban, in his Hasagot on the Rambam's Sefer HaMitzvot², takes a significantly different approach. While not directly commenting on this specific Halacha in Mishneh Torah, his general stance on gmilut chasadim is highly relevant. In the context of his critique of Rambam's first Shoresh (root principle) regarding counting mitzvot, the Ramban argues that bikur cholim, nichum aveilim, hachnasat orchim, and hachnasat kallah are in fact mitzvot d'Oraita. He bases this on the pasuk "וְאָהַבְתָּ לְרֵעֲךָ כָּמוֹךָ" (Vayikra 19:18), which he understands as a direct, Scriptural command to perform all these acts of kindness. For the Ramban, this pasuk isn't merely a general principle informing Rabbinic enactments; it is the source of the mitzvot themselves. He views the specific gmilut chasadim as concretizations of this overarching mitzvah. His chiddush is thus a fundamental reclassification from mid'Rabbanan to mid'Oraita.

Rabbeinu Yonah, Berachot 3a

Rabbeinu Yonah, in his commentary on Berachot 3a³, aligns with the Ramban's view. He likewise posits that bikur cholim and nichum aveilim are mitzvot d'Oraita, derived from the pasuk "Love your neighbor as yourself." His reasoning mirrors the Ramban's, seeing these specific acts as direct fulfillments of the Scriptural imperative for mutual care and love within the community. He emphasizes the broad scope of "Love your neighbor" as encompassing all forms of personal kindness that one would desire for oneself. His chiddush reinforces the mid'Oraita position, demonstrating it was not an isolated opinion but held by significant Rishonim.

Tziunei Maharan on Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14:1:1

The Tziunei Maharan⁴ directly addresses the Kessef Mishneh's observation about the Rambam's lack of source for the mid'Rabbanan classification. He robustly defends the Rambam by identifying the source in Sanhedrin 70b. The Gemara there, discussing the Mishnah about one who is not considered a Ben Sorer u'Moreh (rebellious son) if he eats for a mitzvah or a cheit (sin), explains "דבר שהוא מצוה" (a matter that is a mitzvah) as tanchumei aveilim (comforting mourners). Rashi on Sanhedrin 70b⁵ clarifies that tanchumei aveilim is a "תקנתא דרבנן בעלמא" (merely a Rabbinic enactment). The Tziunei Maharan argues that Rashi's interpretation is muchrach (compelled) because if tanchumei aveilim were mid'Oraita, it would have been listed earlier in the Mishnah under chaburat mitzvah. Furthermore, the Gemara compares it to "דבר עבירה" (a matter of sin) which is interpreted as a public fast, also mid'Rabbanan. The Tziunei Maharan then links this Gemara and Rashi to the Rambam's own words in Hilchot Mamrim 7:2⁶, where the Rambam also refers to tanchumei aveilim as a mitzvah mid'Rabbanan. Thus, his chiddush is to pinpoint the specific textual source and interpretive tradition that forms the basis for Rambam's classification, resolving the Kessef Mishneh's implicit query.

Ohr Sameach on Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14:1:1-2

The Ohr Sameach⁷, in his commentary, also notes the Rambam's classification of bikur cholim and nichum aveilim as mid'Rabbanan, referencing Sanhedrin 70b and Rashi there, similar to the Tziunei Maharan. He then draws attention to the phrase "וְאֵלּוּ הֵן גְּמִילוּת חֲסָדִים שֶׁבְּגוּפוֹ שֶׁאֵין לָהֶן שִׁעוּר" (These are deeds of kindness that one carries out with his person that have no limit). The Ohr Sameach cites the Yerushalmi in Pe'ah 1:1⁸, which explicitly states this distinction: "הדא דתימר בגמ"ח שבגופו אבל בממונו יש לו שיעור" (This is what you say concerning gmilut chasadim sheb'gufo, but concerning monetary gmilut chasadim, there is a limit). His chiddush here is to provide the direct Yerushalmi source for the Rambam's crucial distinction between personal and monetary kindnesses regarding their shiur, affirming that the Rambam's statement is not an innovation but rooted in earlier Chazal.

Friction

The Core Kushya: "Mid'Rabbanan" vs. "Love Your Neighbor"

The most significant friction arises from the Rambam's opening statement that these mitzvot are "מִצְוַת עֲשֵׂה שֶׁל דִּבְרֵיהֶם" (a positive commandment of Rabbinic origin), immediately followed by the declaration that "אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁכָּל מִצְוֹת אֵלּוּ מִדִּבְרֵיהֶם הֲרֵי הֵן בִּכְלַל... וְאָהַבְתָּ לְרֵעֲךָ כָּמוֹךָ." This seems to present an inherent tension, if not a contradiction, that was keenly felt by Rishonim like the Ramban and Rabbeinu Yonah.

The Kushya: How can the Rambam classify bikur cholim and nichum aveilim (and other gmilut chasadim) as mid'Rabbanan when the pasuk "Love your neighbor as yourself" (Vayikra 19:18) is understood by many Rishonim as a mitzvat asseh d'Oraita to perform all necessary acts of kindness for a fellow Jew? The Rambam himself uses this pasuk to include these mitzvot, implying a Scriptural basis. If the pasuk commands us to love our neighbor as ourselves, and this love is concretized by acts such as visiting the sick or comforting mourners, then surely these specific actions should be seen as direct fulfillments of a mitzvat asseh d'Oraita, not merely Rabbinic enactments that fall under its general umbrella. The Rambam's own definition of "Love your neighbor" as "whatever you would like other people to do for you, you should do for your comrade" suggests a direct, active obligation that would logically stem from the Torah itself.

The Terutz: Rambam's Interpretation of "Biklal" and the Sanhedrin Sugya

The best terutz for the Rambam's position is offered by the Tziunei Maharan, elucidating the Rambam's understanding through the sugya in Sanhedrin 70b and Rashi's commentary there.

Terutz: The Rambam distinguishes between the overarching principle of "Love your neighbor as yourself" and the specific Halachic obligations of particular gmilut chasadim. While the pasuk establishes a general Scriptural imperative for mutual care and empathy – forming the ethical bedrock of these mitzvot – the specifics of how this love is expressed in bikur cholim or nichum aveilim, including their particular parameters, forms, and scope, are Rabbinic enactments.

The Tziunei Maharan points to Sanhedrin 70b. The Mishnah discusses a Ben Sorer u'Moreh who consumes food "for a mitzvah or for a sin." The Gemara asks: "What is 'for a mitzvah'?" and answers: "תנחומי אבלים" (comforting mourners). Rashi⁹ explicitly states there, "תקנתא דרבנן בעלמא הוא" (it is merely a Rabbinic enactment). The Tziunei Maharan cogently argues that this Rashi is muchrach (compelled). If tanchumei aveilim were mid'Oraita, it would be categorized as a "חבורת מצוה" (a mitzvah gathering) which is already mentioned earlier in the Mishnah. Furthermore, the Gemara contrasts "דבר מצוה" with "דבר עבירה" which Rashi identifies as a public fast, itself a Rabbinic institution. This parallel suggests that both are mid'Rabbanan.

Thus, for the Rambam, the pasuk "Love your neighbor as yourself" is not a mitzvat asseh that directly commands bikur cholim or nichum aveilim as distinct actions. Rather, it is a meta-commandment or a general ethical principle. Chazal, seeing the profound importance of actualizing this principle, instituted specific mitzvot like bikur cholim and nichum aveilim. These Rabbinic enactments are "בִּכְלַל" (included in) the Scriptural command in the sense that they are the means by which the Torah's ethical vision is realized, and they embody its spirit. They draw their chizuk and moral weight from the pasuk, but their Halachic obligation and specific details are mid'Rabbanan. This explains the Rambam's consistent classification here and in Hilchot Mamrim 7:2, as noted by the Kessef Mishneh and the Tziunei Maharan.

Intertext

Pe'ah 1:1 and Yerushalmi Pe'ah 1:1

The Rambam states: "וְאֵלּוּ הֵן גְּמִילוּת חֲסָדִים שֶׁבְּגוּפוֹ שֶׁאֵין לָהֶן שִׁעוּר" (These are deeds of kindness that one carries out with his person that have no limit). This declaration finds its direct antecedent in the Mishnah Pe'ah 1:1¹⁰: "אלו דברים שאין להם שיעור: הפאה, והבכורים, והראיון, וגמילות חסדים, ותלמוד תורה." (These are the things which have no measure: the corner [of the field], the first fruits, the appearance [before God in the Temple], acts of kindness, and Torah study). The Yerushalmi on Pe'ah 1:1¹¹ further refines this, explaining the scope of "גמילות חסדים" that has no shiur: "הדא דתימר בגמילות חסדים שבגופו, אבל בממונו יש לו שיעור." (This refers to gmilut chasadim sheb'gufo [kindness with one's person], but for gmilut chasadim sheb'mamono [kindness with one's money], there is a measure). The Rambam, in Hilchot Avel 14:1, directly incorporates this Yerushalmi distinction, emphasizing that personal acts of kindness, such as visiting the sick or comforting mourners, have no upper limit to their performance, while monetary charity, for instance, typically has prescribed limits (e.g., 20% of one's assets). This highlights the unique and boundless nature of personal involvement in chesed.

Sotah 14a and Genesis 18:3

The Rambam states: "שֶׁמָּא הַכְנָסַת אוֹרְחִים גְּדוֹלָה מִכֻּלָּן. זֶה חֹק שֶׁתִּקֵּן אַבְרָהָם אָבִינוּ... גְּדוֹלָה הַכְנָסַת אוֹרְחִים מִקַּבָּלַת פְּנֵי שְׁכִינָה שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (בראשית יח ג) 'וַיַּרְא וְהִנֵּה שְׁלֹשָׁה אֲנָשִׁים'." (Perhaps accompanying guests is greater than all of them... Hospitality for guests surpasses receiving the Divine Presence as Genesis 18:3 states: "And he saw and behold there were three people."). This statement is a direct quote from the Gemara in Shabbat 127a and Sotah 14a¹². The Gemara there relates to Avraham Avinu's actions when three angels appeared to him. He was in the midst of conversing with HaKadosh Baruch Hu (the Divine Presence) but interrupted this sacred communion to attend to his guests. The Gemara infers from this that hachnasat orchim (hospitality) is so paramount that it overrides even the direct engagement with the Shechinah. The pasuk "וַיַּרְא וְהִנֵּה שְׁלֹשָׁה אֲנָשִׁים" (Genesis 18:3) is cited as the prooftext, as Avraham's immediate response was to run to greet them. The Rambam thus grounds the superior value of hospitality in a foundational narrative from Tanakh and its Chazalic interpretation, demonstrating that even mid'Rabbanan mitzvot can have profound Scriptural and aggadic backing that elevates their status.

Psak/Practice

The Rambam's categorization of these fundamental acts of gmilut chasadim as "מִצְוַת עֲשֵׂה שֶׁל דִּבְרֵיהֶם" carries significant implications for Halachic practice and meta-psak heuristics.

1. Bitul Torah: While gmilut chasadim like bikur cholim and nichum aveilim are crucial, their Rabbinic status means they generally do not override Talmud Torah in the same way a mitzvat asseh d'Oraita would, especially if there are others available to perform the mitzvah. The Rambam explicitly states this regarding a funeral: "When does the above apply? When there are not enough people to care for a corpse. If there are enough people to care for it, Torah study should not nullified."¹³ This reflects a nuanced balance between the importance of chesed and the paramount value of Torah study. However, for a Talmid Chacham who also teaches others, the bitul Torah for his funeral is unlimited, showing a hierarchy of honor and communal need.
2. Compulsion and Stringency: Despite being mid'Rabbanan, the Rambam states, "We compel people to accompany wayfarers in the same manner as we compel them to give charity."¹⁴ This kofin (compulsion) implies a high level of obligation, akin to tzedakah which is often considered mid'Oraita (or at least derived from it). Furthermore, the strong language "Whoever does not accompany them is considered as if he shed blood" and "Whoever does not visit the sick is considered as if he shed blood"¹⁵ suggests a profound moral failing, even for a Rabbinic mitzvah. This illustrates that mid'Rabbanan does not equate to leniency when it comes to fundamental ethical duties.
3. "Ein Lahem Shiur": The principle that gmilut chasadim sheb'gufo have no limit (אין להן שיעור) means that one should always strive to increase their performance. This distinguishes them from monetary mitzvot where there might be a maximal obligation. It encourages a proactive and boundless engagement in personal kindness, reflecting the ideal of "Love your neighbor as yourself" without constraint.

Takeaway

The Rambam's classification of gmilut chasadim as mid'Rabbanan yet "included in" "Love your neighbor as yourself" reflects a sophisticated Halachic understanding: specific enactments are Rabbinic, but their spirit and moral imperative derive from a foundational Scriptural principle. This nuanced approach ensures rigorous Halachic definition while upholding the boundless ethical demands of mutual responsibility and kindness.

---

¹ Ohr Sameach on Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14:1:1. ² Ramban, Hasagot al Sefer HaMitzvot, Shoresh Rishon, Teshuvah 3. (As cited by Tziunei Maharan on Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14:1:1). ³ Rabbeinu Yonah on Berachot 3a. (As cited by Tziunei Maharan on Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14:1:1). ⁴ Tziunei Maharan on Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14:1:1. ⁵ Rashi on Sanhedrin 70b s.v. "תנחומי אבלים". ⁶ Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Mamrim 7:2. ⁷ Ohr Sameach on Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14:1:1 and 14:1:2. ⁸ Yerushalmi Pe'ah 1:1 s.v. "הדא דתימר". ⁹ Rashi on Sanhedrin 70b s.v. "תנחומי אבלים". ¹⁰ Mishnah Pe'ah 1:1. ¹¹ Yerushalmi Pe'ah 1:1 s.v. "הדא דתימר". ¹² Sotah 14a. ¹³ Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14:8. ¹⁴ Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14:3. ¹⁵ Mishneh Torah, Mourning 14:3 and 14:4.