Exodus 21:1-24:18

Sugya Map

• Issue: The semichut parshiyot (juxtaposition of sections) of Parashat Mishpatim to the preceding laws of the Altar. Specifically, why do civil laws immediately follow the commands regarding building an altar?
• Nafka Mina(s): The ideal disposition and conduct of judges, the spiritual essence of jurisprudence, and the symbolic placement of the Sanhedrin.
• Primary Sources: Exodus 21:1¹; Exodus 20:23²; Sanhedrin 7b³.

Text Snapshot

• Exodus 21:1: "וְאֵלֶּה הַמִּשְׁפָּטִים אֲשֶׁר תָּשִׂים לִפְנֵיהֶם."
  • The connective "וְאֵלֶּה" (and these are) implies a continuation or direct consequence of the preceding section.
  • "תָּשִׂים לִפְנֵיהֶם" (you shall set before them) is understood by Chazal to refer to judges⁴.
• Exodus 20:23: "וְלֹא תַעֲלֶה בְמַעֲלֹת עַל מִזְבְּחִי אֲשֶׁר לֹא תִגָּלֶה עֶרְוָתְךָ עָלָיו."
  • "בְמַעֲלֹת" (by steps) and "עַל מִזְבְּחִי" (upon My altar) are key. The prohibition is against using steps to ascend the altar, lest one's nakedness be exposed.

Readings

• Rashi (cited by Kli Yakar): Explains the semichut by stating that the Sanhedrin should be placed אצל המזבח (by the altar)⁵.
• Kli Yakar: Synthesizes the Gemara's interpretations of Ber Kapara and R. Elazar. He argues that the "וְאֵלֶּה" (and these) means the previous laws (Exodus 20:23) also apply to judges. Crucially, he interprets "על מזבחי" not just as "upon my altar" but also "אצל מזבחי" (by my altar)⁶. This allows the prohibition of "ולא תעלה במעלות" to inform judicial conduct:
  • Ber Kapara's Drash (as per Kli Yakar): A judge should be מתון בדין (deliberate in judgment). Rushing to judgment, like "ascending with haughtiness" (דרך גאה וגאון), stems from pride, contrasting with the altar's message of humility (מזבח אדמה)⁷.
  • R. Elazar's Drash (as per Kli Yakar): A judge should not "יפסיע על ראשי עם קודש" (step over the heads of the holy people) – meaning, not stride haughtily or disrespectfully, for the Sanhedrin is אצל המזבח, a place of reverence⁸.

Friction

• Kushya: How can a verse prohibiting altar steps, which prevent physical exposure, serve as a direct admonition for judicial deliberation or humility? This seems like a drash disconnected from the pshat.
• Terutz (Kli Yakar): The semichut parshiyot (signified by "וְאֵלֶּה") connects the altar laws to the judicial laws. The ambiguity of "על" (upon/by) in "על מזבחי" is resolved by this connection. If the Sanhedrin is אצל המזבח, then the rules governing ascent to the altar (no haughtiness, no rushing) apply mutatis mutandis to the judge sitting by the altar. The physical space informs the spiritual conduct.

Intertext

• Psalms 75:3: "כִּי אֶקַּח מוֹעֵד, אֲנִי מֵישָׁרִים אֶשְׁפֹּט" (When I choose a set time, I will judge with equity). Kli Yakar cites this to underscore the importance of taking time (מועד) and deliberation in judgment⁹.
• Mishlei 27:17: "בַּרְזֶל בְּבַרְזֶל יָחַד" (Iron sharpens iron). Kli Yakar uses this to derive the etymology of shochad (bribe) as חד (sharp), arguing that a bribe "sharpens" the judge's opinion to render a quick, biased verdict, obviating the need for deliberation¹⁰.

Psak/Practice

The meta-halachic implication is profound: judicial integrity is not merely about correct legal application, but about the judge's inner spiritual state. A judge must approach the bench with anivut (humility) and yishuv ha'da'at (deliberation), recognizing the gravity of their role and the divine presence in judgment. This principle underlies prohibitions against ga'avah in the Beit Din and the importance of thorough investigation.

Takeaway

The juxtaposition of altar and judgment teaches that true justice flows from a place of profound humility and patient deliberation, mirroring the sanctity and self-effacement demanded by divine service.

---

¹ Exodus 21:1. ² Exodus 20:23. ³ Sanhedrin 7b. ⁴ Ramban on Exodus 21:1:1. ⁵ Kli Yakar on Exodus 21:1:1, citing Rashi. ⁶ Kli Yakar on Exodus 21:1:4. ⁷ Kli Yakar on Exodus 21:1:3, 21:1:5. ⁸ Kli Yakar on Exodus 21:1:2, 21:1:5. ⁹ Kli Yakar on Exodus 21:1:3. ¹⁰ Kli Yakar on Exodus 21:1:6.