Tanya, Part I; Likkutei Amarim 3:1

Sugya Map

• Issue: The structure and origin of the soul's faculties, specifically the tripartite division (Nefesh, Ruach, Neshamah) and its manifestation through ten faculties, mirroring the Ten Sefirot.
• Nafka Mina: Understanding the inherent hierarchy and interconnectedness of intellect (Chabad) and emotional attributes (Middot) in spiritual service. This has implications for how one cultivates love and awe of God, and the role of intellectual engagement in achieving true emotional connection. It also informs the metaphysical underpinnings of divine service and the nature of the human soul's connection to its divine source.
• Primary Sources:
  • Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 3:1
  • Zohar (various citations within the text)
  • Sefer Yetzirah (implied by the Sefirot structure)
  • Etz Chaim (cited for elemental correspondences)
  • Tanakh (Psalms 84:3, 42:3, 63:2; Genesis 4:1)

Text Snapshot

"Now, each distinction and grade of the three—nefesh, ruach, and neshamah—consists of ten faculties, corresponding to the supernal ten sefirot (Divine manifestations), from which they have descended, which are subdivided into two, namely, the three “mothers” and the seven “multiples,” namely, chochmah (wisdom), binah (understanding), and daat (knowledge); and the “seven days of Creation”: chesed (kindness), gevurah (power), tiferet (beauty), and so on. Similarly is it with the human soul, which is divided in two—sechel (intellect) and middot (emotional attributes). The intellect includes chochmah, binah, and daat (chabad), while the middot are love of G–d, dread and awe of Him, glorification of Him, and so forth. Chabad [the intellectual faculties] are called “mothers” and source of the middot, for the latter are “offspring” of the former. The explanation of the matter is as follows: The intellect of the rational soul, which is the faculty that conceives any thing, is given the appellation of chochmah—כ“ח מ“ה—the “potentiality” of “what is.”... When one brings forth this power from the potential into the actual, that is, when [a person] cogitates with his intellect in order to understand a thing truly and profoundly as it evolves from the concept which he has conceived in his intellect, this is called binah. These [ chochmah and binah] are the very “father” and “mother” which give birth to love of G–d, and awe and dread of Him. For when the intellect in the rational soul deeply contemplates and immerses itself exceedingly in the greatness of G–d, how He fills all worlds and encompasses all worlds, and in the presence of Whom everything is considered as nothing—there will be born and aroused in his mind and thought the emotion of awe for the Divine majesty... Next, his heart will glow with an intense love... This constitutes the culminating passion of the soul... Daat, the etymology of which is to be found in the verse, “And Adam knew ( yada) Eve,” implies attachment and union. That is, one binds his mind with a very firm and strong bond to, and firmly fixes his thought on, the greatness of the En Sof, blessed is He, without diverting his mind [from Him]."

• Dikduk/Leshon Nuance: The text uses the term "consists of" (footnote 1 clarifies this is a manifestation, not composition). The play on words for chochmah (כ“ח מ“ה) is explicitly noted, linking it to potentiality. The etymology of daat from "yada" (ידע) is crucial, emphasizing connection and union, not mere intellectual knowledge. The use of "mothers" and "offspring" (or "father" and "mother" giving birth) creates a vivid organic metaphor for the generation of middot from chabad.

Readings

Rashi on Sefer Yetzirah 1:1

Rashi, in his commentary on Sefer Yetzirah, establishes the fundamental concept of the Sefirot as divine emanations and building blocks of creation. He states, "עשרה ספירות בלי מה, הן הן עשר מדות של הקדוש ברוך הוא" ("Ten Sefirot without substance, they are the ten attributes of the Holy One, Blessed be He").¹ This is a foundational statement linking the abstract Sefirot to divine attributes. While Rashi doesn't explicitly map them to the soul's faculties as the Tanya does, his emphasis on their nature as divine attributes from which reality emerges provides the metaphysical bedrock for the Tanya's assertion that the soul, being created in the image of God, mirrors these divine structures. Rashi's focus is on their divine origin and function in creation, setting the stage for understanding how these principles are internalized within the human being.

Rambam, Moreh Nevukhim Part I, Chapter 37

Maimonides, in the Guide of the Perplexed, discusses the divine attributes. While he famously cautions against anthropomorphizing God and rejects the notion of multiple divine attributes in a literal sense, he does acknowledge terms like "wisdom," "power," and "will" as referring to God's actions and the effects of His will. He writes, "For all these denominations, such as wisdom, power, will, and life, are predicated of Him in respect of the effects that proceed from Him" (Moreh Nevukhim I, 37).² Maimonides' approach is primarily philosophical and emphasizes God's absolute unity and incorporeality. He interprets divine attributes as concepts relating to God's causality and relationship to creation, rather than inherent parts of God's essence. This contrasts with the Kabbalistic understanding, which the Tanya draws heavily upon, where the Sefirot are seen as distinct channels of divine emanation and operation, both in the divine realm and, by extension, in the human soul. The Tanya, by directly mapping the soul's faculties to the Sefirot, is operating within a framework that Maimonides would interpret more metaphorically or causally.

---

¹ Rashi, Sefer Yetzirah 1:1 s.v. עשרה ספירות. ² Maimonides, Moreh Nevukhim, trans. Shlomo Pines (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963), I, 37, p. 76.

Friction

The Tanya presents a clear hierarchy where Chabad (intellect) serves as the "mothers" and source for the Middot (emotional attributes), which are described as their "offspring." This is explicitly stated: "Chabad [the intellectual faculties] are called 'mothers' and source of the middot, for the latter are 'offspring' of the former." This assertion faces a potential difficulty when one considers the concept of teshuvah and the power of teshuvah to transform even the most deeply ingrained negative traits (middot). If middot are merely offspring, dependent on the intellectual "mothers," how can they be fundamentally altered or transcended in a way that seems to imply a direct, independent power to shift one's emotional disposition, sometimes even without a full intellectual grasp of the underlying principles?

One might pose a kushya: If middot are born from chabad, and chabad is the intellect, then a change in middot should logically follow a change in chabad. Yet, we see individuals who achieve profound emotional transformation and develop intense love and awe of God, sometimes through an experiential encounter or a moment of sudden clarity, rather than a protracted intellectual process. This suggests that the middot might possess an inherent vitality or a capacity for self-correction that isn't solely dependent on the ongoing intellectual stimulation of chabad.

A potential terutz lies in understanding daat as the crucial mediating faculty. The text itself describes daat as "the basis of the middot and the source of their vitality; it contains chesed and gevurah, that is to say, love with its offshoots and fear with its offshoots."³ Daat, derived from "yada" (to know, to cleave, to unite), is not merely intellectual apprehension but a profound existential attachment. It is the faculty that "binds his mind with a very firm and strong bond to, and firmly fixes his thought on, the greatness of the En Sof."⁴ This binding act, this deep union, is what imbues the middot with true vitality and directs their energy.

Therefore, while chabad provides the conceptual framework and the initial spark, daat is the engine that translates intellectual understanding into dynamic emotional commitment. The power of teshuvah can be seen as an activation or deepening of daat. It's not that the middot are changed independently of intellect, but rather that the faculty of daat can be intensely activated, creating a powerful internal shift that reorients the middot. This activation of daat might not always be a linear, logical progression from chabad in the conventional sense; it can be a powerful, soul-level attachment that then reconfigures the emotional landscape. The middot are not merely passive offspring but are animated by this active daat. Thus, the transformation of middot is a testament to the potent, unifying force of daat, which can rechannel or revitalize them, even if the preceding intellectual process was not the primary catalyst.

---

³ Tanya, Part I; Likkutei Amarim 3:1. ⁴ Ibid.

Intertext

Tanakh: The Concept of "Knowing" God and its Emotional Manifestation

The Tanya's emphasis on daat as the faculty of attachment and union, derived from the root "yada," finds a profound parallel in the Tanakh's understanding of "knowing" God. In Jeremiah 31:33, God declares, "כי זאת הברית אשר אכרת את בית ישראל אחרי הימים ההם נאם ה' נתתי את תורתי בקרבם ולתתיה על לבבם והייתי להם לאלהים והמה יהיו לי לעם" ("For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the LORD: I will put My law in their inward parts, and write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people").⁵ The placement of God's law "in their inward parts" and "on their hearts" suggests a profound internalization that moves beyond mere intellectual assent to a deep, emotional, and volitional engagement. This is precisely what the Tanya describes as the role of daat in binding the mind and soul to God, leading to the generation of love and awe.

Similarly, Hosea 4:6 states, "עם לבב ידעוני" ("with their hearts they will know Me").⁶ The juxtaposition of "heart" and "knowing" underscores that true knowledge of God is not a detached intellectual exercise but a deeply felt, experiential connection. The Tanya's model, where chabad (intellect) leads to daat (attachment), which in turn animates middot (emotions), directly reflects this biblical understanding of spiritual knowing as an integrated process of mind, heart, and will. The "knowing" of God in the Tanakh is not just cognitive; it is a transformative relationship that shapes one's entire being.

Shulchan Aruch: The Role of Intention and Love in Mitzvot

While the Tanya delves into the metaphysical structure of the soul, its implications for practice are grounded in the practical application of mitzvot. The Shulchan Aruch, in various places, emphasizes the importance of kavanah (intention) and ahavah (love) in fulfilling commandments. For instance, in Hilchot Tefillah, concerning the recitation of Shema, it is stated that one who recites it without kavanah has not fulfilled his obligation.⁷ The kavanah required is not merely understanding the words, but a heartfelt engagement with their meaning and a connection to the Divine.

This resonates with the Tanya's teaching that chabad without daat can lead to "vain fancies." True kavanah in prayer or the performance of mitzvot requires the binding faculty of daat to connect the intellectual understanding of the commandment to a genuine love and awe of God. The middot of love and awe, as taught by the Tanya, are the vital components that elevate the performance of mitzvot from a mechanical act to a spiritual communion. The emphasis on loving God with "all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your might" (Deuteronomy 6:5) is the ultimate expression of daat and the middot it engenders, as described in the Tanya. The Shulchan Aruch's requirement for kavanah is thus a halachic manifestation of the internal spiritual architecture described in the Tanya.

---

⁵ Jeremiah 31:33. ⁶ Hosea 4:6. ⁷ Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 60:4.

Psak/Practice

The intricate mapping of the soul's faculties to the Sefirot, as presented in Tanya 3:1, has significant implications for the practice of Divine service. The core principle is that spiritual growth is not solely an intellectual pursuit but a holistic endeavor involving the intellect (chabad) and emotions (middot), mediated by the faculty of attachment (daat).

In practical terms, this means that when engaging with Torah study or prayer, one should strive to move beyond mere cognitive understanding. The aim is to cultivate daat, the conscious and deliberate binding of one's mind and heart to God's greatness. This is achieved by deeply contemplating God's immanence and transcendence, leading to the arousal of awe and love.

For instance, when learning a concept in Torah, the goal is not just to grasp its logical structure but to allow that understanding to deepen one's awe of the Creator and foster a burning love for Him. Similarly, in prayer, the words are vehicles for connecting the intellect to the emotions, aiming for a state of profound attachment (daat) that animates genuine ahavah and yirat Hashem. The absence of this vital connection can render even profound knowledge insufficient. Therefore, a meta-heuristic emerges: prioritize cultivating daat as the bridge between intellectual understanding and the heartfelt emotions that define true Divine service.

Takeaway

The soul's faculties mirror the divine Sefirot, with intellect (chabad) birthing emotional attributes (middot) through the crucial faculty of attachment (daat). True Divine service requires the integrated activation of these faculties, moving beyond mere knowledge to a profound, heartfelt union with God.