Jerusalem Talmud Nazir 6:6:2-9:1

Here is a chevruta-level analysis of the Jerusalem Talmud Nazir 6:6:2-9:1:

Sugya Map

• Issue: The precise timing of a nazir's purification and completion of his vows, particularly concerning the interplay between sprinkling, immersion, shaving, and sacrifice, and its comparison to the purification process of a metzora (sufferer from skin disease).
• Nafka Mina(s):
  • When can a nazir who became impure resume his nezirut and bring his sacrifices?
  • The exact day a nazir is considered fully pure and able to bring his final sacrifices.
  • The relationship between shaving and sacrifice for a nazir versus a metzora.
  • The start date for counting subsequent days of nezirut after a period of impurity.
  • The status of a nazir who becomes impure again after immersion but before sacrifice.
  • The order and binding nature of the nazir's final sacrifices (purification, elevation, well-being).
  • The significance of unspecified sacrifices.
  • The halachic treatment of the nazir's shorn hair and its connection to the well-being offering.
  • The conditions under which the nazir is permitted to drink wine and become impure again.
• Primary Sources:
  • Numbers 19 (Red Heifer ashes for purification)
  • Numbers 6:9-12, 14-21 (Laws of Nezirut)
  • Leviticus 14:1-9 (Laws of Metzora purification)
  • Jerusalem Talmud Nazir 6:6 (Mishnah and Halakha)
  • Jerusalem Talmud Nazir 9:1 (Mishnah and Halakha)
  • Tosefta Nazir 4:8
  • Mishnah Nega'im 14:3
  • Mishnah Zevachim 10:5
  • Mishnah Temurah 7:4
  • Sifra Metzora
  • Sifrei Zuta
  • Jerusalem Talmud Sotah 5:2
  • Jerusalem Talmud Nedarim 6:1
  • Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat 7:1-2
  • Jerusalem Talmud Terumot 10:1
  • Jerusalem Talmud Orlah 1:4
  • Babylonian Talmud Nazir 18b, 45b, 46b, 47b, 52a
  • Babylonian Talmud Yoma 61b

Text Snapshot

MISHNAH (6:6): "What is shaving in impurity? He was sprinkled on the third and seventh [days], shaves on the seventh, and brings his sacrifices on the eighth. If he shaved on the eighth, he may bring his sacrifices on the same day, the words of Rebbi Aqiba. Rebbi Ṭarphon asked him, what is the difference between this one and the sufferer from skin disease? He told him, the purification of this one is bound to his days, but the purification of the sufferer from skin disease is bound to his shaving. He cannot bring his sacrifices unless the sun had set for him."

• Dikduk/Leshon Nuance:
  • "What is shaving in impurity?" (מהו גילוח בטומאה) – This is a classic Yerushalmi opening, seeking the precise definition or condition. It's not just "shaving," but "shaving in the context of impurity."
  • "sprinkled on the third and seventh" (נתז עליו בשלישי ובשביעי) – The passive voice nif'al (נתז) implies the sprinkling is done to him, emphasizing his passive reception of the purification rite.
  • "shaves on the seventh, and brings his sacrifices on the eighth" (ומגלח בשביעי ומביא קרבנותיו בשמיני) – A clear sequence.
  • "If he shaved on the eighth, he may bring his sacrifices on the same day" (ואם גילח בשמיני מביא קרבנותיו בו ביום) – This is the crux of R. Aqiba's position – the act of shaving enables the sacrifice on that very day, provided the other conditions are met.
  • "what is the difference between this one and the sufferer from skin disease?" (מה בין זה למצורע) – The direct comparison highlights the distinct mechanisms of purification.
  • "the purification of this one is bound to his days" (טהרתו של זה תלויה בימיו) – The nazir's purification is dictated by a fixed calendar of sprinkling and immersion, irrespective of when the final act of shaving occurs within that timeframe.
  • "but the purification of the sufferer from skin disease is bound to his shaving" (של מצורע תלויה בתגלחתו) – The metzora's purity hinges on the completion of his shaving, which then triggers the subsequent steps.
  • "He cannot bring his sacrifices unless the sun had set for him" (לא יביא קרבנותיו עד שיערוב שמש) – This refers to the general principle that immersion alone does not confer purity for sancta until sunset.

HALAKHAH (6:6): "It is written: 'He has to vow to the Eternal the days of his nezirut,' from the day he brings his sacrifices, the words of Rebbi. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah says, from the time of his shaving. Rebbi Ze‘ira in the name of Rav Hoshaia, Rebbi Ḥiyya in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: Where do they disagree? If he shaved on the seventh and brought his sacrifices on the eighth. But if he shaved on the eighth and brought his sacrifices on the same day, everybody agrees on the day he brings his sacrifices."

• Dikduk/Leshon Nuance:
  • "He has to vow to the Eternal the days of his nezirut" (חייב לנדור לה' ימי נזירותו) – This is a quote from Numbers 6:12, but the Yerushalmi is interpreting its starting point.
  • "from the day he brings his sacrifices" (מיום שהוא מביא קרבנותיו) – R. Yehuda (or simply "Rebbi" here) bases the commencement of the nezirut count on the completion of the entire sacrificial process.
  • "from the time of his shaving" (משעת גילוחו) – R. Yose b. R. Yehudah argues the nezirut count can begin once the nazir is ritually ready to resume his status, which is marked by shaving.
  • "Where do they disagree?" (היכן מחלוקתן) – A standard Yerushalmi method of analysis, seeking the specific scenario that generates the dispute.
  • "If he shaved on the seventh and brought his sacrifices on the eighth." (נתגלח בשביעי והביא קרבנותיו בשמיני) – Here, there's a clear separation. R. Yehuda says the count starts on the eighth (sacrifice day), R. Yose b. R. Yehudah on the seventh (shaving day).
  • "But if he shaved on the eighth and brought his sacrifices on the same day, everybody agrees on the day he brings his sacrifices." (אבל נתגלח בשמיני והביא קרבנותיו בו ביום, הכל מודים ביום שמביא את קרבנותיו) – This clarifies the disagreement: it's about the interim period between shaving and sacrifice when they are on different days. If they are on the same day, the act of sacrifice is the clear marker for both opinions.

Readings

Rebbi Aqiba vs. Rebbi Tarfon on the Nazir and Metzora (Mishnah 6:6)

The core of the first Mishnah introduces a dispute between Rebbi Aqiba and Rebbi Tarfon regarding the purification process of a nazir who has been in impurity. Rebbi Aqiba states that if a nazir is sprinkled on the third and seventh days, shaves on the seventh, and brings his sacrifices on the eighth, this is the standard order. However, if he shaves on the eighth day, he can bring his sacrifices on that same eighth day. Rebbi Tarfon challenges this, asking the crucial question: "What is the difference between this one [the nazir] and the sufferer from skin disease (metzora)?"¹

The critical distinction, as explained by Rebbi Aqiba, lies in the basis of their purification: "the purification of this one [the nazir] is bound to his days, but the purification of the sufferer from skin disease is bound to his shaving."²

Penei Moshe's Elaboration: Penei Moshe clarifies the nazir's process: "His purification is dependent on his days. A nazir's purification is dependent on the sprinkling on the third and seventh and immersion. Therefore, since he became pure on the seventh, even if he did not shave until the eighth day, he can bring his sacrifices on that day."³ This highlights that the fixed schedule of sprinkling (and subsequent immersion) is the primary determinant of the nazir's readiness for sacrifice. The shaving, while required, does not independently dictate the purification timeline once the sprinkled days have passed.

For the metzora, Penei Moshe explains: "But a metzora's purification is dependent on his shaving. As it is written, 'On the seventh day he shall shave all his hair' (Leviticus 14:9), and afterwards it is written, 'and he shall wash his flesh with water, and be clean' (Leviticus 14:10). And if he immersed himself before shaving, his immersion was not effective. Therefore, if he shaved on the eighth, he still requires immersion and sunset. Thus, he cannot bring his sacrifices until the ninth."⁴ This shows that for the metzora, shaving is a prerequisite to the immersion that confers final purity, and this entire process must be completed before the subsequent stages can commence, including the sunset requirement for sancta.

Korban Ha'edah's Perspective: Korban Ha'edah echoes this understanding. Regarding the nazir, it states: "A nazir's purification is dependent on the sprinkling of the third and seventh and immersion. Therefore, since he became pure on the seventh, even if he did not shave until the eighth day, he can bring his sacrifices on that day."⁵ This reinforces the idea that the calendrical purification rites are paramount for the nazir.

For the metzora, Korban Ha'edah adds: "But a metzora's purification is dependent on his shaving. As it is written, 'On the seventh day he shall shave all his hair...' and afterwards it is written, 'and he shall wash his flesh with water and be clean.' And if he immersed himself before shaving, his immersion was not effective. Therefore, if he shaved on the eighth, he still requires immersion and sunset, and thus he cannot bring his sacrifices until the ninth."⁶ This again emphasizes the sequential and dependent nature of the metzora's purification, where shaving is a critical precursor to effective immersion and final clearance.

The Commencement of Nezirut Count (Halakha 6:6)

The subsequent Halakha section delves into the interpretation of the verse "He has to vow to the Eternal the days of his nezirut."⁷ The dispute centers on when the count of nezirut days actually begins.

Rebbi's View: "From the day he brings his sacrifices."⁸ This interpretation suggests that the nezirut period, for halachic purposes and counting, only truly commences once the nazir has completed the entire process of purification and sacrifice. This implies that any prior period of shaving or readiness is not the formal start of the vow's fulfillment in terms of its duration.

Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah's View: "From the time of his shaving."⁹ This view, supported by Rebbi Ze'ira in the name of Rav Hoshaia and Rebbi Hiyya in the name of Rebbi Johanan, posits that the count begins as soon as the nazir is ritually shaven, signifying his readiness to resume his state of purity.

The Point of Disagreement: The gemara pinpoints the disagreement: "Where do they disagree? If he shaved on the seventh and brought his sacrifices on the eighth."¹⁰ In this scenario, Rebbi would count from the eighth (sacrifice day), while Rebbi Yose b. Rebbi Yehudah would count from the seventh (shaving day). However, if the shaving and sacrifice occur on the same day (the eighth), "everybody agrees on the day he brings his sacrifices."¹¹ This indicates that when the acts are contiguous, the final act of sacrifice serves as the undisputed marker. The dispute arises when there's an interval between shaving and sacrifice, and the question is whether the nazir's status is considered active from the moment of shaving or only after the final sacrifice.

The Nazir's Final Sacrifices and Unspecified Offerings (Mishnah 9:1)

The Mishnah then shifts to the nature of the sacrifices brought by a nazir at the end of his term, specifically when he has been impure. He brings three animals: a purification sacrifice (chatat), an elevation sacrifice (olah), and a well-being sacrifice (shelamim).¹²

Rebbi Yehudah's Position: "He slaughters the well-being sacrifice and shaves for it."¹³ This implies a specific order: the shelamim is brought first, and the shaving is connected to this particular sacrifice.

Rebbi Eleazar's Position: "He only should shave for the purification sacrifice since that has precedence everywhere."¹⁴ Rebbi Eleazar argues that the shaving should be intrinsically linked to the chatat, as purification sacrifices generally take precedence in the order of offerings. However, the Mishnah concludes: "but if he shaved for any of the three, he satisfied his obligation."¹⁵ This offers a measure of leniency, suggesting that the specific connection of shaving to one particular sacrifice might not be strictly binding if the act of shaving is performed.

The Halakha's Interpretation: The Halakha grapples with the interpretation of Numbers 6:17: "The ram he shall offer, etc."¹⁶ Rebbi Joshua ben Levi explains: "Why does the verse say, 'he shall offer'? Start the procedure with it."¹⁷ This implies that the shelamim offering, mentioned with the verb "he shall offer," should initiate the sacrificial process.

Rebbi Ḥinena challenges this, citing the verse that also mentions the flour offering and libation: "He shall offer his flour offering and his libation."¹⁸ If the shelamim is to start the procedure, why are these also mentioned with "he shall offer"? The resolution is that "If he shaved for any of the three, he satisfied his obligation."¹⁹ This reiterates the Mishnah's leniency, suggesting that the precise order might be less critical than the completion of all required acts.

The Halakha then raises the principle: "All purification offerings in the Torah precede the reparation offerings."²⁰ Rebbi Eleazar states, "it is everybody’s opinion, 'all purification offerings in the Torah precede the reparation offerings.'"²¹ This foundational principle seems to be applied here to the nazir's purification, where the chatat (purification offering) must be considered in its proper sequence relative to other types of offerings.

Unspecified Sacrifices and the Hair (Mishnah 9:1)

Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel addresses a scenario where a nazir brings three animals but "did not specify"²² which was for which sacrifice. He posits that the correct sacrifice is automatically assigned: the one suitable for the purification offering is used as such, the one for the elevation offering as such, and the one for the well-being offering as such. This is possible because the species and sex of the animals are distinct for each type of sacrifice (female sheep for chatat, male sheep for olah, male goat for shelamim).²³

The Mishnah then describes a peculiar practice: "He took the hair shorn from his nazir head and sent it under the cooking pot."²⁴ This is linked to the shelamim offering, as Numbers 6:19 explicitly states the hair is put "under the pot of the shelamim offering." The Halakha clarifies: "even if he shaved in the countryside... he sent it under the cooking pot."²⁵ However, there's a crucial distinction: "When has this been said? If he shaved in purity. But if he shaved in impurity, he does not send it under the cooking pot."²⁶ The implication is that the hair of an impure nazir is treated differently, likely needing to be buried, as opposed to being burned with the sacrificial meat.

The Halakha's Analysis: The Halakha elaborates on the unspecified sacrifices. "They wanted to say, if he did not specify, but in his house he did specify."²⁷ This suggests a scenario where the initial dedication was general, but the selection of the animals was specific. The gemara rejects this, stating, "even in his house he need not specify."²⁸ The reason given is: "The animal which at the start has the rules of the indeterminate."²⁹ This means that for nazir sacrifices, a general dedication ("for the nazir's sacrifices") is sufficient, as the specific animal type automatically designates its use.

Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun, in the name of Rav, explains the hair's placement: "He puts it into the sauce."³⁰ The reason is: "'He puts it into the fire,'³¹ the sacrifice also into the fire."³² This connects the burning of the hair with the cooking of the shelamim offering, symbolizing their shared fate and the nazir's complete return to normalcy.

The Halakha then presents a complex baraita concerning the conditions for sending the hair under the cooking pot. It distinguishes between the pure and impure nazir, and between the Temple and the countryside. The core principle seems to be that the hair is sent under the cooking pot only when the nazir shaves in purity, and the act is linked to the sacrificial process itself. "Nobody sends under the cooking-pot except the one who shaves in purity."³³

Permitted Acts After Sacrifice (Mishnah 9:1)

The Mishnah concludes by stating: "Afterwards the nazir is permitted to drink wine and to defile himself with the dead."³⁴ This marks the completion of his nezirut and the lifting of its restrictions.

Rebbi Simeon's Qualification: Rebbi Simeon offers a more nuanced view: "when one of the bloods was sprinkled, the nazir is permitted to drink wine and to defile himself with the dead."³⁵ This suggests that the nazir's release from his vows might begin once the process of sacrifice has been validated by the sprinkling of blood on the altar, even if the entire ceremony isn't fully concluded. The Halakha notes the ambiguity here: "it remains unclear whether the nazir is permitted only after all ceremonies or after the start of the ceremonies, when one of the sacrifices was validated by having its blood sprinkled on the walls of the altar."³⁶

The subsequent Halakha sections delve into discussions about cooking, dema'i (produce suspected of being terumah or ma'aser that has not been properly tithed), and the significance of waving offerings. These discussions, while related to sacrificial practices, move into more detailed areas of kashrut and ritual law that are tangential to the core nazir purification debate. However, the discussion on Rav's statement that "waving stops the nazir"³⁷ connects directly back to the nazir's release, indicating that the completed waving ceremony is indeed a prerequisite for drinking wine and becoming impure.

---

¹ Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:2 ² Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:2 ³ Penei Moshe on Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:1:3 (my translation) ⁴ Penei Moshe on Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:1:4 (my translation) ⁵ Korban Ha'edah on Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:1:3 (my translation) ⁶ Korban Ha'edah on Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:1:4 (my translation) ⁷ Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:7 ⁸ Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:7 ⁹ Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:7 ¹⁰ Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:7 ¹¹ Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:7 ¹² Yerushalmi Nazir 9:1 ¹³ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:1 ¹⁴ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:1 ¹⁵ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:1 ¹⁶ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:2 ¹⁷ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:2 ¹⁸ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:2 ¹⁹ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:2 ²⁰ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:2 ²¹ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:2 ²² Yerushalmi Nazir 9:3 ²³ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:3 ²⁴ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:3 ²⁵ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:3 ²⁶ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:3 ²⁷ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:4 ²⁸ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:4 ²⁹ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:4 ³⁰ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:4 ³¹ Numbers 6:18 ³² Yerushalmi Nazir 9:4 ³³ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:5 ³⁴ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:1 ³⁵ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:1 ³⁶ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:1 (note 224) ³⁷ Yerushalmi Nazir 9:7

Friction

The central friction within this sugya revolves around the precise criteria that signify the completion of a nazir's purification and the resumption of his normal life, particularly the ability to drink wine and become impure again. This friction is most sharply articulated in the contrast between the nazir's purification process and that of the metzora, and further nuanced by differing interpretations of when the nezirut count truly begins.

The Mishnah in 6:6 presents Rebbi Aqiba's view that if a nazir shaves on the eighth day, he can bring his sacrifices on that same day. This stands in stark contrast to the metzora, whose purification is tied to shaving preceding immersion and sunset, pushing his sacrifice to the ninth day if shaving is on the eighth. The reason offered is that the nazir's purification is "bound to his days" (תלויה בימיו), meaning the fixed schedule of sprinkling (third and seventh days) and immersion is paramount, while the metzora's is "bound to his shaving" (תלויה בתגלחתו), meaning the act of shaving is the trigger for the subsequent purification steps.

This distinction is robust, but the friction emerges in the Halakha section, specifically regarding the commencement of the nezirut count itself. Rebbi holds that the count begins "from the day he brings his sacrifices," while Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah argues it starts "from the time of his shaving."¹ This difference is critical. If a nazir shaves on the seventh day but brings his sacrifices on the eighth, Rebbi Yose b. R. Yehudah would count the seventh day as part of his nezirut, while Rebbi would only start counting from the eighth.

The Kushya: The core kushya emerges when we consider the principle that a nazir cannot drink wine or become impure until his sacrifices are brought and validated. If Rebbi Yose b. R. Yehudah permits the nezirut count to begin from the moment of shaving, even if the sacrifices are yet to be brought (and thus the nazir cannot yet drink wine), does this not create a paradox? How can a period be counted as nezirut if the fundamental restrictions of nezirut (like abstaining from wine) are still in effect for the nazir? In other words, if the nazir is still obligated to abstain from wine because his sacrifices are not yet complete, how can the count of his nezirut begin from an act (shaving) that precedes the full completion of the sacrificial rites that lift the wine prohibition? This seems to conflate the readiness to fulfill the nezirut (signified by shaving) with the actual commencement of the fulfilled nezirut period, which, according to Rebbi, is tied to the sacrifice.

If Rebbi Yose b. R. Yehudah's view implies that the nazir is in a state of nezirut from the moment of shaving, even if he must still await the sacrifices to drink wine, then his nezirut count is active while he is still under the full restrictions of nezirut. This seems to contradict the idea that the count is for the "days of his nezirut," implying a period where his status is fully established and the restrictions are being observed as a completed vow.

The Terutz (or interpretations): Several avenues can resolve this friction:

1. Distinguishing Between "Ritual Readiness" and "Halachic Fulfillment": Rebbi Yose b. R. Yehudah's position might focus on the ritual readiness to resume his nezirut status. The shaving, after immersion and sprinkling, marks the point where the nazir is no longer impure and is therefore capable of being a nazir. From this point of capability, the count begins. The subsequent sacrifices are a necessary step to lift the specific prohibitions like drinking wine, but the nezirut vow itself is considered in effect from the moment of ritual cleansing and shaving. The period between shaving and sacrifice is still a period of nezirut, albeit one where certain privileges (like wine) are withheld due to incomplete sacrifice. This is analogous to how a nazir who vows for thirty days must still observe the restrictions even if he shaves on the first day and brings sacrifices on the second; the count is from the first day.

2. Focus on the Nefesh (Soul/Self) as the Subject of the Vow: The vow is made by the nefesh. The shaving signifies the renewal of the nefesh's dedication. Even if the physical restrictions are not fully lifted until the sacrifice, the nefesh has recommitted. Therefore, the count of the vow's duration begins from this recommitment. The sacrifices are the means to terminate the vow's restrictions, but the vow's lifespan begins with the renewal of intention and ritual readiness.

3. Reconciliation with Rebbi's View: Perhaps Rebbi Yose b. R. Yehudah does not disagree fundamentally about the restrictions applying until the sacrifice. The disagreement is purely about the start of the count. Rebbi insists the count begins when the sacrifice is brought, signifying the completion of the impure state and the full return to the nazir's consecrated life. Rebbi Yose b. R. Yehudah, however, sees the shaving as the act that transitions the nazir from impurity back into a state of potential nezirut, and thus the count of his vow begins then. The period between shaving and sacrifice is still a period of nezirut, but one where the nazir cannot yet partake in wine. This implies that the count of days is not solely about the absence of restrictions, but about the duration of the consecrated state, which is renewed upon shaving.

4. The "Days of his Nezirut" (ימי נזירותו) as a Distinct Concept: The verse is "He has to vow to the Eternal the days of his nezirut." Rebbi Yose b. R. Yehudah might interpret "days of his nezirut" as the period during which he is considered a nazir, even if he cannot perform all the associated actions. The shaving marks the end of his impurity and the return to his nazir status. The sacrifices are the means to end that status and lift the specific prohibitions. Therefore, the count starts from when he is a nazir again, not necessarily from when he is released from all nezirut obligations.

The ultimate resolution hinges on understanding whether "days of his nezirut" refers to the period of active observance of restrictions, or the period of being ritually designated as a nazir. Rebbi Yose b. R. Yehudah's view prioritizes the latter, aligning with the idea that shaving marks the end of impurity and the resumption of the nazir status.

---

¹ Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:7

Intertext

Numbers 19 and the Metzora's Purification

The comparison between the nazir and the metzora is central to understanding the timing of purification. The nazir's purification hinges on the ashes of the Red Heifer (Numbers 19), which are sprinkled on the third and seventh days. This calendrical sprinkling is a key element.

Numbers 19:12: "The pure one shall sprinkle upon the impure one on the third day and on the seventh day; and on the seventh day he shall purify himself, and wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in water; and he shall be pure on the eve."

This verse establishes the ritual for purification from corpse impurity. The "third and seventh day" are fixed points. The nazir who becomes impure must undergo this ritual. The Mishnah states he shaves on the seventh day and brings sacrifices on the eighth. This implies that by the seventh day, after the sprinkling and immersion, he is considered ritually cleansed for the purposes of bringing sacrifices, even if the final sacrifices occur later.

Leviticus 14:1-9 (The Metzora's Purification): "The LORD spoke to Moses, saying: This shall be the law of the metzora on the day of his cleansing. He shall be brought to the priest... And the priest shall command that two living clean birds, and cedar wood, and scarlet yarn, and hyssop be brought for him that is to be cleansed... And the priest shall command that one of the birds be killed in an earthen vessel over running water. As for the living bird, he shall take it, and the cedar wood, and the scarlet yarn, and the hyssop, and shall dip them in the blood of the bird that was killed over the running water, and he shall sprinkle it seven times upon him that is to be cleansed from the leprosy. Then he shall pronounce him clean, and shall let the living bird fly away into the open field... And he that is to be cleansed shall wash his clothes and shave off all his hair and bathe himself in water; and he shall be clean. And after that he shall come into the camp, but he shall dwell outside his tent seven days. And on the seventh day he shall shave off all his hair, his head and his beard and his eyebrows, even all his hair he shall shave off; and he shall wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in water; and he shall be clean."

The critical difference highlighted in the Yerushalmi is that the metzora's purification is "bound to his shaving" (תלויה בתגלחתו). Leviticus 14:8 states, "And he that is to be cleansed shall wash his clothes and shave off all his hair... And on the seventh day he shall shave off all his hair..." This indicates a sequence: shaving is a component before final cleansing and re-entry into society. The Yerushalmi's commentary (Penei Moshe, Korban Ha'edah) emphasizes that if the metzora immerses before shaving, the immersion is ineffective. This dependency of immersion on prior shaving, and the subsequent requirement for sunset purity for sancta, is what pushes the metzora's sacrifice to the ninth day if shaving occurs on the eighth. The nazir, by contrast, has his purification dictated by the calendar of sprinkling and immersion, making the shaving a step performed after the primary purification rites are complete, thus allowing for sacrifice on the eighth day even if shaving is deferred to that day.

Numbers 6:12 and the Start of the Nezirut Vow

The Halakha section presents a dispute regarding the starting point of the nezirut count, based on Numbers 6:12: "He has to vow to the Eternal the days of his nezirut."¹

Numbers 6:12: "He has to vow to the Eternal the days of his nezirut, and bring a lamb in its first year for a sin offering; and the former days shall be void, because his separation was defiled."

The Halakha interprets "the days of his nezirut" differently. Rebbi argues it begins "from the day he brings his sacrifices." This connects the duration of the vow to the completion of the entire sacrificial process, which signifies the definitive end of any impurity and the full return to the nazir's consecrated state.

Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah, however, states it begins "from the time of his shaving." This perspective focuses on the act that signifies the end of ritual impurity and the resumption of the nazir's status. Shaving, after the sprinkling and immersion, is the physical manifestation of his return to purity and his renewed commitment to nezirut.

This intertextual connection to Numbers 6:12 highlights the ambiguity in the verse itself. Does "days of his nezirut" refer to the period of being under vow, or the period during which the vow's full observance is possible and its restrictions are being met? The Yerushalmi's analysis of this verse, pitting Rebbi against R. Yose b. R. Yehudah, shows how precise textual interpretation can lead to differing halachic conclusions about the start date of a consecrated period.

---

¹ Yerushalmi Nazir 6:6:7

Psak/Practice

The most direct psak arising from this sugya relates to the timing of a nazir's purification and the commencement of their nezirut count. While the Yerushalmi presents differing opinions, the general practice tends to align with the principle that the nezirut count begins when the nazir is ritually purified and ready to resume his vows, not necessarily solely when the final sacrifices are offered.

Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah's Opinion as Normative: The opinion of Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah, that the count begins from the time of shaving, is generally adopted in practice for determining the duration of nezirut. This is because shaving, following the requisite sprinklings and immersion, signifies the nazir's transition from impurity back to a state of ritual cleanness and readiness. The period between shaving and sacrifice is still considered part of the nezirut, even if the nazir cannot yet drink wine or become impure. The sacrifices serve to terminate the period of impurity and release the nazir from certain restrictions, but the count of the nezirut period itself commences with the return to a state of purity.

The Metzora Distinction: The clear distinction drawn between the nazir and the metzora is crucial for psak. The metzora's purification is sequential and conditional: shaving must precede immersion, and immersion followed by sunset is required for sancta. This complexity means that if a metzora shaves on day eight, his purification is not complete until day nine, and his sacrifices thus occur on day nine. This meticulous attention to the order of rites is vital for any case involving purification from severe afflictions.

Unspecified Sacrifices: The leniency regarding unspecified sacrifices by Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel is also practical. If a nazir brings the correct animals but doesn't specify their purpose, the animal's designation (female sheep for chatat, male sheep for olah, male goat for shelamim) automatically determines its role. This avoids potential issues where a nazir might mistakenly bring the wrong animal for a specific sacrifice, as the system ensures the correct sacrificial role is assigned based on the animal's type.

Meta-Heuristic: The sugya demonstrates a key heuristic in Talmudic analysis: the importance of precise timing and the sequence of ritual acts. When comparing different purification processes (like nazir and metzora), the focus shifts to the specific scriptural basis for each ritual. The Yerushalmi's method of dissecting a verse to determine the start of a vow period illustrates the meticulous approach to defining halachic timelines, even when seemingly straightforward. The underlying principle is that ritual purity and the commencement of vows are not always synonymous with the complete lifting of all restrictions, but rather with the transition into a state of ritual readiness.

Takeaway

The precise sequencing of ritual acts—sprinkling, immersion, shaving, and sacrifice—defines the completion of purification and the resumption of religious vows, with distinct rules for different states of ritual impurity. The commencement of a vow's duration is determined not only by the completion of sacrifices but also by the initial act of ritual readiness, such as shaving after impurity, signifying a return to one's consecrated status.