I Samuel 5

Hook

Imagine walking into a sun-drenched synagogue in the old Jewish quarter of Jerusalem, Damascus, or Casablanca on a Shabbat morning. The air is sweet with the scent of jasmine and orange blossom water, sprinkled onto the hands of the congregants. At the center of the sanctuary stands the Tebah—the elevated reader's platform—where the Hazzan (cantor) stands draped in a flowing, white tallit. As the doors of the Hechal (the Ark) are opened, the congregation does not see a soft, fabric-clad scroll. Instead, they behold a majestic, upright cylinder of polished silver and dark olive wood, crowned with shimmering finials (rimonim) that chime like desert bells with every movement.

This is the Tik—the rigid, protective case that houses the Torah in the Sephardi and Mizrahi traditions. It is a living echo of the ancient Ark of the Covenant, a portable sanctuary that commands absolute reverence wherever it travels. In this lesson, we journey into the dramatic narrative of I Samuel 5, where the physical Ark of God is captured by the Philistines, only to prove that the Divine Presence cannot be domesticated, contained, or conquered. Through the rich interpretive lenses of our great Sephardi and Mizrahi sages, and the beautiful musical traditions of the Maqamat (Middle Eastern melodic modes), we will discover how this ancient story of exile and vindication continues to resonate in our living customs today.

---

Context

Place

The vast geographic and cultural expanse of the Sephardi and Mizrahi world, stretching from the golden courts of medieval Andalusia (Spain) and Provence, through the thriving Ottoman centers of Salonica, Izmir, and Aleppo, to the ancient, continuous Jewish communities of Mesopotamia (Iraq) and North Africa.

Era

The biblical narrative is set during the tumultuous transition from the era of the Judges to the unified Israelite Monarchy (circa 11th century BCE). We view this text through the intellectual and spiritual renaissance of the medieval Spanish and Provencal commentators (11th–14th centuries CE), whose linguistic and rationalist methodology still guides our understanding of the Hebrew Bible.

Community

The global family of Sephardim and Mizrahim, who have preserved an unbroken chain of oral tradition, liturgical poetry (piyut), and musical genius. For these communities, the text of the Prophets (Nevi'im) is not merely read as ancient history, but is sung, dramatized, and woven into the sensory fabric of communal life.

---

Text Snapshot

I Samuel 5:1–3

וּפְלִשְׁתִּים לָקְחוּ אֵת אֲרוֹן הָאֱלֹהִים וַיְבִיאֻהוּ מֵאֶבֶן הָעֶזֶר אַשְׁדּוֹדָה׃ וַיִּקְחוּ פְלִשְׁתִּים אֵת אֲרוֹן הָאֱלֹהִים וַיָּבִיאוּ אֹתוֹ בֵּית דָּגוֹן וַיַּצִּיגוּ אֹתוֹ אֵצֶל דָּגוֹן׃ וַיַּשְׁכִּמוּ אַשְׁדּוֹדִים מִמָּחֳרָת וְהִנֵּה דָגוֹן נֹפֵל לְפָנָיו אַרְצָה לִפְנֵי אֲרוֹן יְהֹוָה וַיִּקְחוּ אֶת־דָּגוֹן וַיָּשִׁבוּ אֹתוֹ לִמְקוֹמוֹ׃

"When the Philistines captured the Ark of God, they brought it from Eben-ezer to Ashdod. The Philistines took the Ark of God and brought it into the temple of Dagon and they set it up beside Dagon. Early the next day, the Ashdodites found Dagon lying face down on the ground in front of the Ark of the Lord. They picked Dagon up and put him back in his place..."

I Samuel 5:10–11

וַיְשַׁלְּחוּ אֶת־אֲרוֹן הָאָלֹהִים עֶקְרוֹן וַיְהִי כְּבוֹא אֲרוֹן הָאֱלֹהִים עֶקְרוֹן וַיִּזְעֲקוּ הָעֶקְרֹנִים לֵאמֹר הֵסַבּוּ אֵלַי אֶת־אֲרוֹן אֱלֹהֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לַהֲמִיתֵנִי וְאֶת־עַמִּי׃ וַיִּשְׁלְחוּ וַיַּאַסְפוּ אֶת־כׇּל־סַרְנֵי פְלִשְׁתִּים וַיֹּאמְרוּ שַׁלְּחוּ אֶת־אֲרוֹן אֱלֹהֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְיָשֹׁב לִמְקֹמוֹ וְלֹא־יָמִית אֹתִי וְאֶת־עַמִּי כִּי־הָיְתָה מְהוּמַת־מָוֶת בְּכׇל־הָעִיר כָּבְדָה מְאֹד יַד הָאֱלֹהִים שָׁם׃

"Then they sent the Ark of God to Ekron. But when the Ark of God came to Ekron, the Ekronites cried out, 'They have moved the Ark of the God of Israel to us to slay us and our kindred.' They too sent messengers and assembled all the lords of the Philistines and said, 'Send the Ark of the God of Israel away, and let it return to its own place, that it may not slay us and our kindred.' For the panic of death pervaded the whole city, so heavily had the hand of God fallen there..."

---

Minhag/Melody

The Musical Landscape of the Maqamat

In the Sephardi and Mizrahi traditions, the reading of the Torah and the Prophets is never a monotone recitation. It is an exquisite art form governed by the Maqamat—the classical Arabic modal system that has been adopted and sanctified by Jewish communities across the Middle East for centuries. Each Shabbat has its own designated Maqam (singular of Maqamat), chosen to match the emotional theme of the weekly Torah portion or the historical context of the calendar.

For a dramatic, tense, and ultimately triumphant narrative like the journey of the captured Ark in I Samuel 5, a Hazzan trained in the Jerusalem-Sephardic tradition would expertly employ Maqam Hijaz or Maqam Rast.

• Maqam Hijaz is a scale characterized by its melancholic, soulful, and deeply evocative intervals, often associated with moments of exile, longing, and intense divine majesty. When chanting the verses describing the Ark sitting in the dark temple of the pagan idol Dagon, the Hazzan uses the lower, brooding registers of Hijaz to paint an auditory picture of captivity and desecration.
• Maqam Rast, on the other hand, represents firmness, clarity, majesty, and the direct, unyielding power of God. As the narrative shifts to the dramatic fall of Dagon—where the idol is found face-down, its head and hands severed upon the threshold—the Hazzan's voice transitions into the triumphant, soaring tones of Rast, mirroring the vindication of Israel's God over the powerless deities of the ancient Near East.

In the Syrian Jewish community of Aleppo (Halab), this narrative is not merely read; it is felt through the Baqashot—the sacred, mystical petitions sung by the congregation in the early hours of Shabbat morning during the winter months. The theme of the Ark's captivity and its self-engineered release serves as a powerful metaphor for the Jewish people in exile. Just as the Ark could not be held by its captors and brought havoc upon them until they returned it with treasures, so too does the Holy One, Blessed be He, protect the Jewish people in their exile, ensuring their ultimate redemption.

The Sages in Conversation: Translating the Commentaries

To understand how our ancestors visualized this dramatic clash of civilizations, we turn to the classical Sephardi and Mizrahi commentators, whose words we translate here from their original Hebrew and Aramaic.

Ralbag (Rabbi Levi ben Gershon, 14th-Century Provence)

On I Samuel 5:1:

והנה הביאו הפלשתים ארון האלהים בבית ע"א שלהם שהיה בהם צלם על צורת בן אדם שהיו קורין אותו דגון

"And behold, the Philistines brought the Ark of God into the house of their idol, which contained an image in the form of a human being that they called Dagon."

Ralbag, a master astronomer, mathematician, and philosopher of the rationalist Andalusian-Provencal school, seeks to demystify the pagan worship. While some midrashic traditions suggest Dagon was a fish-god (from the Hebrew word dag, fish), Ralbag emphasizes its human-like form (tzurat ben adam). By doing so, he highlights the supreme irony of the narrative: the Philistines placed a physical representation of a human being next to the Ark of the infinite, formless Creator, thinking they could match the two. The subsequent collapse and dismemberment of Dagon demonstrate the utter futility of comparing human creations to the Divine.

Malbim (Rabbi Meir Leibush ben Yehiel Michel Wisser, 19th Century)

On I Samuel 5:1:

השאלות (א-ב) מ"ש ופלשתים לקחו את ארון האלהים, ויקחו פלשתים את ארון האלהים, הוא כפל

"The Questions: That which is written, 'And the Philistines took the Ark of God' [in verse 1] and 'And the Philistines took the Ark of God' [in verse 2]—this is a duplication."

Malbim, whose commentary is highly prized in Sephardi yeshivot for its meticulous grammatical precision, addresses a classic textual difficulty. Why does the Bible repeat the phrase "took the Ark"? He explains that the first "taking" was the chaotic capture on the battlefield of Eben-ezer, while the second "taking" was a deliberate, ceremonial act of triumph. They did not merely store the Ark as war booty; they escorted it with pomp and circumstance into the inner sanctum of Dagon to assert the cultural and spiritual superiority of their deity. This double-taking underscores the depth of their pride, making their subsequent humiliation all the more profound.

Rabbi Adin Even-Israel Steinsaltz (20th-Century Jerusalem)

On I Samuel 5:1:

"The Philistines took the Ark of God and brought it from Even HaEzer, where they were encamped, to Ashdod, one of the large Philistine cities."

Rabbi Steinsaltz, a towering figure of modern Israeli Sephardic scholarship, provides the crucial geographic and historical context. Ashdod was not a mere village; it was one of the five royal cities of the Philistine pentapolis, a major urban center of wealth, military power, and religious devotion. By bringing the Ark to Ashdod, the Philistines were bringing the God of Israel into the heart of their empire, setting the stage for a public, undeniable demonstration of divine sovereignty.

Malbim on the Panic of Ekron

On I Samuel 5:10:

וישלחו לכן לא אספו את הסרנים בזאת הפעם רק שלחוהו מעצמם, אחר שכבר יעצו הסרנים לשלחו ממקום המכה אל מקום אחר, אבל העקרונים שבא הארון לשם זעקו זעקה גדולה, כי עד עתה היה רק מכה וחולי ועתה היתה מהומת מות ולכן זעקו הסבו וכו' להמיתני וכו'

"They sent: Therefore, they did not assemble the lords [of the Philistines] this time; rather, they sent it on their own initiative, since the lords had already advised moving it from the place of the plague to another place. However, the Ekronites, upon the Ark’s arrival there, cried out with a great outcry, because until now there was only a plague and illness, but now there was a deadly panic. Therefore, they cried out, 'They have moved [the Ark]... to put me to death...'"

Malbim masterfully captures the psychological deterioration of the Philistine alliance. The first time the Ark caused trouble in Ashdod, they held a formal, orderly council of all the five lords (seranim). But by the time the plague hit Gath, panic had shattered their political unity. The citizens of Gath acted unilaterally, dumping the hot potato of the Ark onto their neighbors in Ekron without consulting the leadership. The Ekronites immediately recognized this betrayal, realizing that the divine punishment had escalated from painful disease to immediate, widespread mortality (mehumat mavet).

Metzudat David (Rabbi David Altschuler, 18th Century)

On I Samuel 5:10:

ואת עמי. כי שרי העם היו הזועקים

"'And my people': For the princes of the people were the ones crying out."

Radak (Rabbi David Kimhi, 12th-13th Century Provence)

On I Samuel 5:10:

להמיתני ואת עמי. שרי עיר עקרון אמרו כן

"'To put me and my people to death': The princes of the city of Ekron said this."

Both Radak (who descended from a distinguished line of Andalusian grammarians) and Metzudat David clarify the syntax of the Ekronites' cry. The singular "me" (lehamiteni) refers to the individual ruler or prince of Ekron, while "my people" (v'et ami) refers to the citizens under his charge. This linguistic detail reveals that the leadership of the city felt a direct, personal threat. In the ancient world, a ruler’s primary duty was to secure the protection of the gods; here, the rulers of Ekron openly admit their helplessness in the face of the God of Israel.

Rashi (Rabbi Shlomo Yitzhaki, 11th-Century France)

On I Samuel 5:11:

"Deadly upheaval. All upheavals [mentioned in Scripture] are caused by thunder. The following is the origin: 'Adonoy thundered with a great noise on that day against the Philistines, making them panic' (below 7:10). It is so explained in the Aggadah of Thirty-Two Rules of R. Eliezer, the son of R. Yose Haglili."

Rashi connects the "deadly upheaval" (mehumat mavet) felt in Ekron to a cosmic, acoustic phenomenon: divine thunder. Drawing from the ancient Midrashic rules of interpretation, Rashi shows that the hand of God did not just strike the Philistines with physical ailments, but shattered their mental resolve with terrifying, supernatural sounds that echoed across the heavens.

---

Contrast

The Casing of the Scroll: Tik vs. Mantle

The way a community houses and interacts with the physical scroll of the Torah is a profound reflection of its historical journey, aesthetic values, and theological focuses.

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              HOUSING THE SACRED WORD                    │
├────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┤
│     SEPHARDI / MIZRAHI     │         ASHKENAZI          │
│          (The Tik)         │        (The Mantle)        │
├────────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────┤
│ • Rigid wood/metal case    │ • Soft fabric dress        │
│ • Scroll stands upright    │ • Scroll laid flat         │
│ • Opened via hinges        │ • Unrolled using rollers   │
│ • Decorated with metalwork │ • Embroidered with velvet  │
│ • Read standing vertically │ • Read lying horizontally  │
└────────────────────────────┴────────────────────────────┘

In the Sephardi and Mizrahi world, the Torah is housed in a Tik—a cylindrical, rigid case made of wood, silver, or brass. The parchment of the scroll is wound around two internal rollers, and the entire case is opened by hinges, allowing the text to be read while the scroll stands upright on the table.

In contrast, the Ashkenazi tradition houses the Torah in a Mantle—a soft, flowing velvet or silk embroidered dress that is slid over the top of the scroll. To read from an Ashkenazi Torah, the mantle is completely removed, and the scroll is laid flat upon the bimah (reading table).

The Aesthetics of Majesty vs. Intimacy

Neither of these practices is halakhically "superior" to the other; rather, they represent two beautiful, complementary expressions of love for the Torah:

• The Sephardi Tik emphasizes the physical preservation of the Ark of the Covenant. Because the parchment is never removed from its protective shell, it is shielded from dust, humidity, and accidental tears. The rigid, upright posture of the Tik reflects the kabbalistic concept of Zeir Anpin standing tall—acting as a direct, vertical channel of divine energy flowing from the heavens down into the congregation. It presents the Torah as a sovereign, royal entity, echoing the majesty of the Ark in I Samuel 5 that could not be touched or laid low by human hands.
• The Ashkenazi Mantle emphasizes a sense of tender intimacy and exposure. By removing the mantle, the reader and the congregation interact directly with the exposed parchment, feeling the vulnerability and closeness of the divine word. Laying the scroll flat resembles a person opening a book to study, highlighting the intellectual, dialogical relationship between the student and the text.

The Ritual of Elevation: Kamah vs. Haqbah

This difference in physical form leads to a fascinating liturgical variation. In the Sephardi custom, the elevation of the Torah—called Kamah or Levantamiento—is performed before the Torah reading begins. The open scroll, standing upright within its Tik, is lifted high, turned in all directions, and shown to the entire congregation, who point to the script and declare: "And this is the Torah that Moses set before the children of Israel..." Deuteronomy 4:44.

In the Ashkenazi custom, this elevation—called Haqbah—is performed after the reading is completed. The scroll is lifted, unrolled slightly, and shown to the congregation before being dressed back in its mantle.

The Sephardi practice of showing the text before reading is rooted in the pedagogical and mystical principle that "seeing is greater than hearing." By gazing upon the physical letters of the Torah before they are read aloud, the congregant imprints the sacred script onto their soul, transforming the subsequent reading from a passive listening experience into an active, visual verification of the divine covenant.

---

Home Practice

Bringing the Sanctuary Home: Tactile Reverence

The story of the Ark of God reminds us that holiness is not an abstract concept; it has a physical, tactile presence that demands our respect and care. In the Sephardi and Mizrahi home, this translates into a deep, physical affection for sacred objects (Sefarim—holy books). You can easily adopt a few of these beautiful, sensory practices to elevate your own home:

1. The Sephardi Kiss of the Script

During the public Torah reading, when the scroll is elevated during Kamah, Sephardim do not merely look at it from afar. It is customary to extend the pinky finger, or the tzitzit (fringes) of one’s tallit, point it directly toward the letters of the open scroll, and then bring that finger or tzitzit to one's lips to be kissed.

• How to try this at home: When you sit down to study Torah or read from a Chumash, do not treat the book as a mere academic textbook. Before you open it, and when you close it, bring the book to your lips for a gentle kiss. Teach your children to do the same, instilling a physical, muscle-memory reverence for the written word.

2. Creating a "Makom Kadosh" (Sacred Space)

Just as the Ark had its designated place in the Tabernacle, create a specific, honorable place in your home for your holy books.

• How to try this at home: Designate a shelf that is eye-level or higher specifically for your Sefarim. Ensure that no secular books, keys, or mundane items are placed on top of them. When you study, clear the table of clutter first, creating a clean, intentional space that mirrors the dignity of the ancient sanctuary.

3. Reciting the Verse of Revelation

Before you begin your study, take a deep breath and recite the beautiful verse from the Book of Psalms:

גַּל־עֵינַי וְאַבִּיטָה נִפְלָאוֹת מִתּוֹרָתֶךָ׃

"Open my eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out of Your Torah." Psalms 119:18

This simple formula, whispered in the quiet of your home, connects your personal intellect to the grand, continuous chain of Sephardi and Mizrahi seekers who sought not just information, but divine wonder within the sacred text.

---

Takeaway

The dramatic journey of the Ark in I Samuel 5 carries a timeless truth that has sustained the Sephardi and Mizrahi communities through centuries of exile, migration, and cultural upheaval: The Divine Presence cannot be captured.

The Philistines believed that by capturing the physical box of the Ark, they had conquered the God of Israel and could assimilate Him into their pantheon next to Dagon. But the Ark refused to be domesticated. It shattered the idols, plagued the cities, and forced its captors to send it back with gifts of gold.

Throughout our history, empires have risen and fallen, seeking to suppress or assimilate the Jewish soul. Yet, like the Ark, our heritage has proven irrepressible. Whether in the golden age of Spain, the mountains of Kurdistan, the busy markets of Baghdad, or the modern global diaspora, the living voice of the Torah remains sovereign, vibrant, and fiercely independent.

When we sing the words of our prophets in the majestic scales of the Maqamat, when we stand in reverence before the upright silver of the Tik, and when we kiss the sacred letters with our tzitzit, we are not just practicing history. We are participating in a triumphant, living legacy that no exile can contain, and no temple of Dagon can ever overshadow.